The current ‘Delta’ narrative and associated contradictory CDC guidelines are mind-boggling to say the least, but they are just the tip of the iceberg of increasingly nonsensical propaganda coming out of the establishment these days, as the evidence exposing it all for the propaganda it truly is just continues to mount by the day.
In Part 1 of this 2-part series - An Emerging Pandemic of the Injected, we looked at a growing body of evidence revealing an increasing number and percentage of ‘Covid19’ deaths, hospitalizations and ‘confirmed’ infections being recorded among the fully vaccinated, with the highest rate of these increasingly common ‘breakthrough cases’ occurring in places with the highest vaccination rates where they overwhelmingly dominate hospitalizations; and how the establishment is spinning the narrative to blame the so-called vaccine-resistant ‘Delta variant’ as it rolls out a third ‘vaccine’ dose as the ‘solution’ to the ‘problem’ - an injection which, incidentally, being manufactured before the alleged emergence of ‘Delta’ is not specifically formulated to ‘protect’ against this new ‘variant’ and at the same time also increases the risk of ‘vaccine’-induced ADE in recipients resulting in severely “enhanced” disease possibly leading to death.
Warning of this increased risk specifically in the context of “mass vaccination during the current Delta variant pandemic,” the authors of a recent study published in the Journal of Infection proposed that the injections being presently distributed as both a 2-dose vaccination and a 3rd-dose booster under the auspices of curbing the ‘Delta pandemic’ be replaced by “second generation vaccines” with altered “spike protein formulations lacking structurally-conserved ADE-related epitopes,” the presence of which is creating this cause for safety concern; a reasonable consideration that seems to be falling on the same deaf ears which continue to ignore and suppress the hundreds of thousands of reported adverse ‘vaccine’ reactions including over 13,000 deaths, in a bid to distribute their current stockpile of experimental injections as fast and as widely as possible.
We will now turn our attention to this ongoing campaign to inject America, the ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ narrative being sold to advance that agenda, and the CDC-orchestrated deception used to engineer this latest Psyop.
Declaration of a new ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’
We are now officially in a deadly ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’, President Joe Biden proclaimed in the White House press briefing seen below, ravaged by what he initially referred to as the highly contagious “Delta virus,” before quickly ‘correcting’ himself to call it the “Delta variant” that most of us have come to know it by. Make of that gaffe what you will, but it does appear that ‘Delta’ (in combination with ‘long Covid’) has for all intents and purposes become the new ‘Covid19’, with its rise as society’s latest ‘problem’/‘enemy’ coinciding with the rise and official declaration of a whole new ‘pandemic’, our current ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’; and ‘Delta’ is for all intents and purposes being treated as a whole new ‘virus’, complete with a ‘need’ for a whole new round of injections and all.
In support of the declaration of this entirely new ‘pandemic’, all of the usual suspects have been endlessly repeating the claim that 99% of Covid deaths and 95% of hospitalizations are among the unvaccinated. But an admission by the CDC director made earlier this month reveals that the claim - which she herself had previously peddled when she asserted that “over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated” - is, like so many other claims made by the keepers of the Covid Cult, “grossly misleading” as Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham would later describe it; a false claim based on faulty, outdated data being sold with the deliberate intent to deceive and manipulate the public for the purpose of advancing a very specific agenda. That one need look no further than establishment reporting to discover this fact is testament to just how transparent the grand deception has truly become in recent days.
How CDC manipulated data to engineer ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’
In an August 5 video interview, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky inadvertently revealed how her agency had pulled another fast one on the American people by lying with data to create the ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ narrative.
“As it turns out, to achieve those statistics, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021,” Dr. Jospeh Mercola explains in his extremely informative and well documented August 16 piece entitled, How CDC Manipulated Data to Create ‘Pandemic of the Unvaxxed’. At the same time,
It does not include more recent data or data related to the Delta variant, which is now the most prevalent strain in circulation. The problem is, the vast majority of the United States population was unvaccinated during that timeframe.
And anyone with at least two functioning brain cells can recognize that if you’re using data from a time-frame when the vast majority of the country is unvaccinated, then a vast majority of ‘cases’, and by extension hospitalizations and deaths, are necessarily going to be among the unvaccinated, no matter how effective the ‘vaccine’ may or may not be. Too brazen for even the folks over at Fox News to ignore, Laura Ingraham recently took to exposing this “grossly misleading” claim, softly challenging the entire ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ narrative while she was at it, in an unusually revealing episode of the “Ingraham Angle”.
The show featured an interview with Canadian viral immunologist and vaccine researcher Dr. Byram Bridle, who explained that not only is there no evidence to support the establishment narrative, but also why, according to the accepted principles of mainstream science, the injections must be directly responsible for driving the emergence and spread of ‘vaccine resistant variants’ like ‘Delta’:
“Absolutely, it’s untrue to be calling this a pandemic of the unvaccinated. And it’s certainly untrue … that the unvaccinated are somehow driving the emergence of the novel variants. This goes against every scientific principle that we understand.
The reality is, the nature of the vaccines we are using right now, and the way we’re rolling them out, are going to be applying selective pressure to this virus to promote the emergence of new variants. Again, this is based on sound principles.”
He goes on to explain that many of the unvaccinated have already acquired natural immunity, which is both longer lasting and far more effective at preventing infection and serious disease than the ‘vaccine’ which admittedly doesn’t even prevent infection or transmission, let alone lasting protection from disease. On this point most doctors agree, as the presence of a far superior form of “longer lasting and stronger” protection against all known ‘variants’ offered by naturally acquired immunity in those who have previously been infected is supported by a growing body of available peer-reviewed research; although it doesn’t factor into the establishment equation which continues to downplay and ignore this highly relevant aspect of the ‘science’.
The latest research in support of this conclusion comes from Israel, and although the recently published study has yet to be peer reviewed, it is currently the largest analysis of real-world data comparing the long-term efficacy of natural immunity and ‘vaccine’-induced ‘immunity’ to date; and it findings, reported by Bloomberg on August 26 in a headline that reads, Previous Covid Prevents Delta Infection Better Than Pfizer Shot, were quite revealing: “People given both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were almost six-fold more likely to contract a delta infection and seven-fold more likely to have symptomatic disease than those [unvaccinated and single dose recipients] who recovered.”
Although slowly being forced to admit a rapid decline in ‘vaccine’ efficacy, or likely intentionally employing this narrative as its means to sell the ‘need’ for a third dose of the injection, the establishment is desperately attempting to confine its emerging ‘waning vaccine protection’ narrative exclusively to the realm of ‘Delta’ as a ‘vaccine resistant’ strain, unwilling to acknowledge the possibility that the injection’s initial ‘protection’ against even the original strain(s) of the ‘virus’ may also fade, rendering it altogether highly ineffective in all regards.
But long-suppressed data from Pfizer’s Phase 2 clinical trial, available to the company in early April but not published until the end of July, reveals a sharp decline in ‘vaccine efficacy’ in participants even before the alleged emergence of the ‘Delta variant’ in the US, occurring at an increasingly rapid rate as time progressed until the trial was prematurely cut short - particularly noteworthy findings given that the majority of study participants were Americans and indicating that the presently observed waning injection ‘protection’ is likely not restricted to ‘Delta’ and other ‘vaccine resistant’ variants but is in fact universal to all ‘virus’ strains including the original(s) we are told the ‘vaccine’ was specifically formulated to ‘protect’ against.
“From its peak post-dose 2, observed VE [vaccine efficacy] declined,” the study authors wrote, reporting an alleged initial peak efficacy of 96%, dropping to 90% between two to four months, and then quickly dropping again to 84% “from four months to the data cut-off” on March 13, which Peter Doshi, senior editor of the British Medical Journal, calculated to be “about one month later” - or around the 5 month mark), in his scathing review of FDA’s plan to issue premature ‘full approval’ to Pfizer’s ‘vaccine’ based upon limited available data and well before the ongoing 2-year Phase 3 trial is completed.
Even more disturbing is that, as Doshi explains, the study “provides no data on vaccine efficacy past six months, which is the period Israel says vaccine efficacy has dropped to 39%.” But if the ‘efficacy’ continued to depreciate at a similar rate to that observed in the limited timeframe of the 6-month trial, it would, according to my calculations, be at least 75% ineffective by the 6-month mark, and would already be less than 50% ’effective’ just eight months out.
Such data projections are clearly not supportive of the establishment claim that ‘benefits outweigh the risks’ of this injection, which is undoubtedly why Pfizer sat on the data for so long before publishing it, and likely also a major reason it abruptly stopped collecting data altogether so prematurely, ensuring that no post- 6-month efficacy data from a controlled clinical trial scenario would ever be recorded for this experimental drug of theirs. But the little data they did eventually report, in combination with the real-world data coming from everywhere else, tells us all we really need to know. The ‘vaccine’ is not nearly as ‘effective’ as advertised, what little ‘protection’ it may initially offer begins to fade almost immediately and then continues to evaporate at an increasingly rapid rate as time progresses, and this waning efficacy is not restricted to ‘Delta’ and other so-called vaccine-resistant strains.
Given this evidence, I do not think we should discount the possibility that, even if a novel coronavirus is responsible for causing disease labelled ‘Covid19’, the emergence of the so-called vaccine-resistant ‘Delta’ as the primary driver of disease is a fabricated construct invented to provide a ‘vaccine’-friendly narrative to explain the injection’s fast fading ‘efficacy’.
If there is a novel coronavirus responsible for causing disease labelled ‘Covid19’ as the establishment claims, all of the available evidence still indicates that the reality of the situation is the “exact opposite,” as Ingraham put it, of the narrative being put forth by the vaccine-pushers. In this case, not only are the injections highly ineffective against new variants, but are also directly responsible for their emergence and spread, and at the very same time are likely to increase the chance of severe disease and death occurring in those infected due to the very real risk of ‘vaccine’-induced immune enhancement, while not even producing lasting ‘protection’ against the original version of the ‘virus’.
As we’ve already seen, and in the words of Dr. Mercola: “Real-world data from areas with high COVID jab rates show the complete converse of what media, the CDC and White House officials are telling us,” indicating that the real pandemic in the world right now is actually a pandemic of the vaccinated.
Natural immunity, according to the coronavirus narrative, is the only way to achieve an effective, lasting ‘herd immunity’ in the population and truly end this alleged pandemic, and if the injections also “counteract” or “wipe out” existing antibodies in the blood of the previously infected - the initially reported reason the Red Cross stopped accepting convalescent blood donations for ‘Covid19’ patients from the vaccinated - then they are additionally harmful and useful in perpetuating the ‘pandemic’ among the vaccinated in this way as well.
And so the falsely called ‘way out’ presented by the vaccine-pushers will in every way actually ensure the perpetuation of this ‘pandemic’ into eternity, and in doing so will create the perfect opportunity for an endless Big-Pharma profit stream created by the steady stream of additional doses, booster shots and newly formulated injections sold to the public as the ‘solution’ to a ‘problem’ that they are in fact responsible for both causing and perpetuating.
This latest CDC manipulation was not the first in the agency’s coordinated effort to willfully deceive the public towards this end, and it will not likely be the last. What many people may not be aware of, is that the CDC has been working overtime for months now laying the foundations that would be necessary to engineer this ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ Psyop, with this latest manipulation only being the most recent play in a series of well coordinated and deceptive plays employed by the agency to advance the agenda to inject the entire American population at all costs. The CDC has been gaming the numbers since the very inception of this ‘pandemic’, and until this is recognized one cannot truly comprehend the magnitude of the fraud being perpetrated against the American people, and indeed, all the people of the earth.
Laying the foundations for the current ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ Psyop
A little noticed decision made by the CDC on May 1 regarding how it would go about tracking and recording ‘breakthrough cases’ that was not equally applied to the tracking of cases in the unvaccinated would reduce the total number of reported ‘breakthrough cases’ in the vaccinated, but without similarly reducing the total number of recorded cases in the unvaccinated.
“The CDC used to be more thorough in its surveillance of breakthrough cases,” a Guardian opinion piece explains.
It tracked them all between 1 January and 30 April of this year, counting 10,262 in that time frame. But on 1 May, the agency changed its strategy to investigate only breakthrough cases that led to hospitalization or death.
Granted, the author is clearly still spellbound by the Covid Cult wizardry; as simply admitting the ‘vaccines’ are “not 100% effective” and stating that this decision simply means “we may never know” exactly how many ‘breakthrough cases’ actually occur, while simultaneously boldly asserting that these injections are “all powerfully protective against Covid-19,” is not exactly a sign of intellectual honesty; but it will be self-evident to anyone who is able to read between the lines that there is absolutely no way in the world we can truly know that these injections are “all powerfully protective” if at the very same time “we may never know” just how many ‘breakthrough cases’ there actually are. But at least there are a growing number of people in establishment circles finally beginning to take notice of the implications and flawed nature of this decision which, as it is put in the Government Executive, “has left the nation with a muddled understanding of COVID-19's impact on the vaccinated.” (The CDC Only Tracks a Fraction of Breakthrough COVID-19 Infections, Even as Cases Surge.)
Neither of these authors bother to so much as mention the far more noteworthy decision made by the CDC just weeks earlier which would have far greater implications.
Truth be told, this was only the second major play made by the CDC this year in their engineering of the so-called ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’. In mid-April, another decision that went mostly unnoticed would also serve to substantially decrease the number of total positive test results - only among the vaccinated, mind you - ensuring there would be far fewer hospitalized patients testing positive and thus registering as ‘breakthrough cases’ under its new tracking policy to be implemented at the start of the next month.
Just weeks earlier in what may well turn out to be the most revealing establishment move of this entire scamdemic, in a quiet update of its guidance for “COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation,” first archived on April 20, noticed by former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson on April 29, reported by Daniel Horowitz at Blaze Media on April 30, simultaneously being widely picked up by independent media and summarily ignored by the entirety of the establishment presstitute corps, the CDC advised: “Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28."
In an article published by The Sentinel, Dave Trabert summarizes:
As reported by Daniel Horowitz at Blaze Media, the new CDC guidance for “COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation” – meaning people who tested positive after getting vaccinated – says PCR tests should be set at 28 CT or lower. The stated reason for the 28 CT maximum is to avoid false positives on people who have been vaccinated, which would discourage acceptance of the vaccines.
Those unfamiliar with the workings of the PCR tests being widely used to ‘diagnose’ Covid ‘cases’ and how they have been systematically misused from the start to engineer and perpetuate a ‘pandemic’ that never was may not initially recognize the monumentally biased and fraudulent nature of this CDC policy change, but it is enough to understand that these tests work in such a way that higher cycle thresholds will produce a higher rate of false positives, and lower cycle thresholds will produce a lower rate of false positives, with each cycle doubling the magnification of the sample being tested.
Anything over about a CT of 34 will produce absolutely meaningless results - with a CT over 35 never detecting live virus, only dead nucleoides - as even Dr. Fauci has publicly admitted, with a CT of 35-45 generally shown to produce a 90-97% rate of false positives and anything over 29 CT still producing a high rate of false positives, while anything below 25-27 is capable of producing relatively accurate results.
“This is why a Portuguese judge,” Horowitz explains, “ruled that any positive test that used more than 25 cycle thresholds is not reliable and cannot be used to force quarantine.”
Most US labs use a CT of 40, some 37, at least before these new CDC guidelines were implemented, a NYT investigation found, meaning a large majority of people being counted as Covid ‘cases’ are in fact false positives - those labelled as ‘asymptomatic carriers’ or flu patients, for example, being falsely ‘diagnosed’ and labelled as Covid ‘cases’.
This is the natural result of using a PCR test which, for a number of reasons, is both “scientifically meaningless” and “not fit for purpose,” was never designed to be a diagnostic tool, in some cases specifically labelled as “not for use in diagnostic procedures,” then over-cycled and used as the sole or primary means of ‘diagnosis’ and determination of total ‘case’ count. Independent media voices have been screaming about this glaring problem at the top of their lungs ever since these tests were first rolled out as one of the foundational global ‘pandemic’ responses alongside lockdowns, ‘contact tracing’, universal masking and then vaccination; these pleas for scientific rationality falling on deaf ears for months.
White House Coronavirus Task Force coordinator Deborah Birx even stated in a 2020 press conference that these tests were known to be capable of producing highly inaccurate results, citing an expected 50% rate of false positives in a scenario where 1% of the population is infected using a test that is 99% specific (unrealistically high), but the CDC never seemed to care about the mechanism(s) responsible for such an artificially overinflated ‘case’ count until such ‘cases’ began to register in the vaccinated, at which point they suddenly seem to have taken notice of at least this one major aspect of the science.
“Alas, the CDC has suddenly discovered the power of cycle thresholds on PCR testing in determining whether the positive results are real or meaningful,” Horowitz writes.
But here's the problem: Where is this guidance when it comes to non-vaccinated people? As [former NYT reporter Alex] Berenson points out, a standard of 28 CTs applied to the general testing regime would preclude as many as 90% of cases from being recorded, especially when the virus is in low circulation.
The ‘pandemic’ would have looked a lot different indeed, as Berenson points out, if this standard had been applied from the start, and so too would the alleged ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ take on a whole new look if this standard were to be equally applied to the unvaccinated today, quite possibly dissipating entirely.
We can see, then, as Dave Trabert notes:
This is another example of ‘following the science’ only when it suits a political purpose; to wit, CDC is not recommending the lower threshold for anyone else being tested. False positives must be avoided to encourage vaccinations, but false positives to prevent children from attending school or maintain other government restrictions seem OK with CDC.
At this point one might be asking the same question Daniel Horowitz asked: “Why is it that only when it comes to the reputation of the vaccines do they suddenly discover the science of false positives?”
The answer is both obvious and revealing, and should serve to forever dispel the notion that we are merely dealing with an extreme degree of perpetual incompetence.
The CDC along with Dr. Fauci and other key ‘pandemic’ players are to this day knowingly, intentionally, and actively deceiving and manipulating the public to advance a very specific agenda in a strategically coordinated effort to get as many experimental injections into as many Americans’ arms as they can, no matter the cost.
That this was the just the first major step in a planned and concerted effort to this end, in large part by engineering a ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’, is now evident and plain for all to see. After ensuring the reduction of total recorded positive ‘cases’ in the vaccinated by a good 80-90%, the CDC then further reduced the number of ‘breakthrough cases’ that would be reported to the public by tracking only deaths and hospitalizations, before going on to cite outdated data from a time-frame when the vast majority of the nation was unvaccinated to falsely claim that the overwhelming majority of hospitalizations and deaths were currently among the unvaccinated, giving birth to the official ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ narrative being presently peddled in a desperate attempt to force their magic potion up the arms of some 150 million Americans who aren’t buying their lies.
As to that current 20-25% and rising rate of infections in the vaccinated across the country, we can rest assured they are ‘true positives,’ so to speak, identified by a PCR cycle threshold that has reduced the number of positive test results being produced by as much as 90%, while ‘cases’ in the unvaccinated no doubt remain highly overinflated, a fact that nobody in the establishment media will touch with a ten foot pole, not even Laura Ingraham or Tucker Carlson.
This is because the PCR test has become the cornerstone of the entire Scamdemic, the Covid Cult’s sacred cow, and exposing the PCR fraud would not only decimate the ‘vaccine’ narrative, it would threaten to bring the whole entire ‘pandemic’ illusion crashing to the ground.
If 2 of every 10 new ‘cases’ are currently being recorded among the vaccinated, with over-cycled tests producing a false positive rate of just 50% among the unvaccinated, this would translate to 4 of every 8 new ‘cases’ recorded among the unvaccinated being false positives, and would mean about one third or 2 of every 6 actual current infections are among the injected, right in line with the current 35% rate of new ‘cases’ being recorded among the vaccinated in the UK. And if 80-90% or more of new ‘cases’ among the unvaccinated are false positives, as PCR cycle thresholds of 35-40 presumably still being widely used among the unvaccinated are likely producing, then some 55-71% or more of actual infections in the US right now would be among the vaccinated, right in line with the previously cited reports of doctors across the country seeing a sharp increase in vaccinated Covid patients following initial vaccination campaign, accounting for over 50-60% of all ‘Covid19’ patients they were treating by mid-April.
And so it is that not even the numbers from an updated and current data set would be able to accurately reflect the true rate of ‘Covid19’ hospitalization and death among the vaccinated; whatever updated data may be cited in the coming days in place of the “grossly misleading” claims previously made by the CDC, no matter how current that new data may be, will still be based upon numbers that are themselves inherently grossly misleading.
When the CDC director realized she had let slip how her agency had been manipulating the data to create the ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ perception, she immediately played it off as a case of mere negligence, assuring the public that CDC was already working to update the data, preferring her agency to be viewed as grossly incompetent rather than downright criminal. But the pattern of CDC decisions made over the course of the year are not indicative of incompetence at all; on the contrary, they point to the strategic work of ones who are extremely competent, actively engaged in a deliberate and coordinated effort to manipulate the data in one and only one direction, the result consistently being the advancement of one very specific agenda.
All they have to do is hatch the deception and point to the manipulated data, Dr. Fauci nodding in agreement, and, adding a double dose of fear to the equation, all of the political puppets, media talking heads and countless Covid Cult initiates blindly parrot the false and misleading claims across social media platforms, until half the country beLIEves it and we find ourselves in a new ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ that doesn’t actually exist, save in the minds of those caught under their spell. And so is myth transformed into ‘science’ in the minds of the masses. Such is the way the Great Scamdemic was born, such is the way it is perpetuated, and so the Covid Con marches on - built on deception, fueled by fear, and fanned by the ignorance these two have produced.
This campaign to forcibly inject the entire American population is fraudulent at every level, unprecedented in scope, criminal in nature, unethical to the core, and downright tyrannical. Fear, deception, and coercion are not the tools of those looking to help you, they are the tools of those seeking to enslave you.
Anyone still attempting to convince you that those who are pushing these demonstrably dangerous and ineffective experimental injections on Americans actually care about you and your health and safety are either willfully ignorant or they are lying to you; and no amount of censorship, fearmongering, or manipulative media programming can prevent an honest researcher from discovering this truth for themselves.
Of course those who have reached this recognition may wonder just how it is that an agency still unable to find the time to isolate and thus positively identify and prove the existence of ‘SARS-CoV’ can yet somehow manage to identify and track the spread of the ‘Delta variant’.
But simply asking this question in today’s political environment will immediately turn you into a crazy, tin foil hat wearing ‘conspiracy theorist’ nutcase ‘anti-vaxxer’ who is deluded by ‘fake news’, rejects ‘science’, hates your grandma, and wishes death to all the innocent children of the world. But that doesn’t make it any less relevant, and it’s probably a question that we should all be asking. So go ahead and put on that tin foil hat, wear that ‘anti-vaxx’ label as a badge of honor, and join the club; we’re already 150 million Americans strong, if initial injection rates are any indication, and our numbers only growing faster by the day as their nonsensical narrative continues to crumble.