Coronavirus Vaccine: Not All That 'Safe & Effective' After All...

Screenshot_2021-01-22 r TheRightCantMeme - Oh yeah, the coronavirus is totally a Bill Gates conspiracy .png

Only two months into the largest vaccination campaign in world history, and the new experimental mRNA Covid19 vaccines are proving to not be quite as safe and effective as the media hype initially made them out to be. As far as how effective they are, the NY Times on September 23 published an opinion piece that detailed the vaccine trial guidelines for efficacy that are clearly not designed to test whether or not the vaccines are truly effective or not...

Screenshot_2021-01-21 Opinion These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know.png

The mind-blowing truth about the Big Pharma testing protocols for determining Coronavirus vaccine efficacy straight from the NY Times:

If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?

The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.

But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.

According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.

To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.

What this means, as summarized by Jon Rappaport: "TAKEAWAY FROM THE TIMES: The vaccine clinical trials are ONLY designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES."

"Therefore, the leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive."

And so it really shouldn't have come as any surprise when, shortly after the initial deployment of the first approved vaccine (Pfizer's), healthcare professionals began warning the public that the new 'safe and effective' vaccination rollout wouldn't actually stop the spread of the virus, but would instead only offer individual 'immunity'!

A Forbes piece also detailed how the vaccine testing protocols are designed to elicit approval and not a truly safe and effective vaccine, noting: "These trials seem designed to prove their vaccines work, even if the measured effects are minimal."

Screenshot_2021-01-22 Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed.png

A medical study published in late October ahead of the vaccine rollout also concluded there was substantial risk that the new "COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure" to the virus.

"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated," the study authors wrote, adding that the experimental mRNA vaccines "may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials," the study concluded.

Now Moderna's vaccine has joined Pfizer's as part of this global vaccine rollout, and the vaccine injuries from both experimental mRNA vaccines are beginning to stack up surprisingly quickly.

From the first day of the new doses being given to the general public, warnings began to be issued as a number of severe allergic reactions were witnessed, with UK officials recommending people with a history of allergic reactions avoid the new experimental vaccine.

On December 9, the Daily Mail reported that "two NHS staff suffered an 'anaphylactoid reaction' just after being immunised" with the new Pfizer experimental mRNA vaccine.

Within 24 hours of the biggest-ever mass vaccination programme in British history, the UK's drug regulator told anyone with a serious allergy to medicines or food was told not to have the much-vaunted jab.

Meanwhile on December 19, Alaska News reported on similar "severe" allergic reactions in two Alaska health care workers, causing one person to be hospitalized overnight and the other to receive brief emergency treatment. Despite the life threatening allergic reaction in one of these two cases, US health officials were "adamant about the importance of people continuing to receive the vaccine, and the state’s top health official said no changes to the vaccination plan were expected." Due to safety concerns, the Juneau health care worker was not able to receive a second dose of the Pfizer vaccine, but her combination of severe symptoms eventually subsided.

The CDC issued new guidelines on December 20, following five severe reactions to the Pfizer vaccine in the US in one week, in which it stated that anyone suffering severe allergic reactions to the vaccine should avoid receiving a second dose. Unlike the British health regulator, however, the agency still said people with a history of allergic reactions should get vaccinated. The FDA, meanwhile, said the newly approved Moderna vaccine "should not be given to individuals with a known history of a severe allergic reaction to any components of the shot."

In Israel, a 49 year old man was admitted to a Jerusalem emergency center just an hour after being injected with the Pfizer vaccine, "suffering from severe anaphylactic shock." In this case the man did have a history of allergic reactions to penicillin, reinforcing the idea that the new vaccines pose a serious threat to those with any history of allergic reactions.

On December 30, the Times of Israel noted that 14 recipients of the Pfizer vaccine reported allergic reactions, with a total of 1 in 1,000 Israelis reporting adverse affects after being injected.

Additionally, 26 people suffered what the ministry described as “neurological symptoms,” with 19 complaining of a tingly sensation in their arm.

Allergic reactions to the Moderna vaccine don't appear to be any less common, with an NBC 7 headline on January 13 describing how, "Unexpected String of Allergic Reactions Causes Delays at ‘Vaccination Super Station' Near Petco Park".

The California 'vaccination super station' closed for about an hour after six recipients of the new Moderna vaccine developed unexpected allergic reactions in just one morning.

While allergic reactions are expected in mass vaccination operations, that amount seen Wednesday was slightly higher than expected for that time period so the Super Station slowed down vaccinations so they could investigate, Dr. McDonald said. The site also swapped the vaccines it was using for a new batch out of an abundance of caution, in case the reactions had to do with the original batch.

The reaction by those heading up the vaccination campaign indicates that entire batches of vaccine may in fact be 'bad'... At the same time, allergic reactions are far from the only adverse affects being caused by these new experimental chemical concoctions currently being pushed on millions of humans as totally 'safe and effective'.

In just the month of December alone, a staggering total of 3,916 adverse affects including 13 deaths were reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is particularly troubling considering the well established truth that injuries recorded by this ineffective database “represent only a fraction of the serious adverse events," with a 2010 federal study finding that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events” are ever reported to VAERS - as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just pointed out in a recent open letter regarding the planned post-marketing surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines.

From The Defender:

Nine of the deaths followed the Pfizer vaccine and four followed the Moderna shot (see table below). Nearly all of the deceased were institutionalized (primarily in nursing homes), although one 63-year-old male received the injection at work.

Five (and possibly six) of the deaths occurred on the same day as vaccination, all in women and sometimes within 60 to 90 minutes of the injection — and without any “immediate adverse reaction” having been observed.

The reports describe outcomes ranging from “foaming at the mouth” to “massive heart attacks.” Three of the deceased were in their early to mid-60s.

The write-ups that accompany VAERS reports furnish details about these sad fatalities, including the astonishing fact that some of the deceased had actually experienced and recovered from COVID-19 (raising questions about why they were vaccinated).

The write-ups also illustrate the subtle pressure to attribute the cause of death to something other than COVID-19 vaccination.

Screenshot_2021-01-22 Tip of the Iceberg Thousands of COVID Vaccine Injuries and 13 U S Deaths Reported in December Alone •[...].png

By January 16, the number of US deaths following COVID vaccination had already risen to 55, as Norway's deaths rose from 23 to 29. All of the deaths in Norway were linked to the Pfizer vaccine, while the US deaths have occurred among people receiving both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. The number of Norway deaths were significant enough to elicit calls by some health experts for the suspension of all mRNA vaccines.

So while health 'experts' previously warned that deaths following vaccination are normal and to be expected, it is difficult to accept that all of these deaths are merely natural and the timing purely coincidental, considering how soon after injection so many of these deaths are occurring. For example, one 66 year old man in Colorado was found dead the morning after receiving a Moderna injection, while a 93 year old South Dakota man began to feel ill and then died just over two hours after his injection with the Pfizer vaccine.

In New York, the initial two week nursing home vaccination campaign brought about a shocking increase in deaths: "24 deaths among 193 vaccinated residents = 12.4% mortality rate or a 124-fold increase in mortality over and above the COVID-19 death rate for the population at large is reported." The deaths were blamed on a new coronavirus outbreak rather than the vaccine, but if this is truly the case then it appears the vaccine is responsible for sparking the outbreak, as documented by Adam Dick at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Screenshot_2021-01-22 A Nursing Home had Zero Coronavirus Deaths Then, It Vaccinates Residents for Coronavirus and the Deat[...].png

"Another compelling source of data about deaths following receipt of the experimental Pfizer/BioNTech shot comes from a growing number of incidents being reported from Israel and Europe," the Children's Health Defense Team noted:

  • Israel: Four individuals die “shortly after receiving the vaccination,” including two elderly men, aged 75 and 88, who experience apparent heart attacks two to three hours post-Pfizer-vaccine.
  • Norway: Two nursing home residents die within “a few days” of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination.
  • Portugal: Health worker Sonia Acevedo, 41-year-old mother of two, dies suddenly two days after receiving the Pfizer injection.
  • Sweden: An elderly man, age 85, dies of a heart attack one day after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
  • Switzerland: An elderly man, age 91, dies not long after getting the Pfizer shot.

Finally, in early January, news outlets, including The Defender, also described the tragic U.S. case involving Miami obstetrician-gynecologist Gregory Michael, who at age 56 died within two weeks of receiving the Pfizer vaccine — with the cause of death attributed to a “highly unusual clinical case of severe [immune] thrombocytopenia” (ITP).

ITP is considered a Type II “hypersensitivity reaction” (“immune responses that are exaggerated or inappropriate against an antigen or allergen”). Because Michael did not start experiencing symptoms until three days post-vaccination, his case was not captured in a Jan. 6 Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) report on serious allergic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination that limited the analysis to reactions occurring within the first 24 hours.

God only knows how many more cases like Michael's there are that have been missed due to initial effects from adverse reactions not immediately surfacing or being noticed.

"In addition to the deaths, people have reported 96 life-threatening events following COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits," Zero Hedge reported. Such adverse effects do not appear to be isolated, with at least 13 Israelis experiencing cases of facial paralysis following inoculation with the Pfizer vaccine, and the Israeli Ynet reporting that officials believe this number could actually be higher. Cases of paralysis, including Bell's Palsy, have already been observed during clinical trials of a number of Covid19 vaccines.

Additional descriptions of adverse events, as summarized by The Defender, include:

  • A “rare, multisystem inflammatory syndrome,” including heart damage, developed by a 23-year-old male social worker in Israel 24 hours after receiving the Pfizer injection.
  • The seizures and encephalomyelitis (brain and spinal cord inflammation) experienced by 32-year-old Mexican internist Karla Cecilia Perez hours after getting the Pfizer shot.
  • The Bell’s palsy developed by a U.S. nurse within three days of her injection. On YouTube, she warns Americans, “Do not take this vaccination,” saying “I would not wish this on my worst enemy.”

Video by woman claiming to be Tennessee nurse who developed Bell's Palsy shortly after getting her first dose of the Coronavirus vaccine:

A preliminary safety assessment of the Moderna vaccine published by the New England Journal of Medicine actually found a shockingly high 21% rate of adverse effects, but anyone referencing these findings have been dutifully 'fact-checked' by the establishment media.

And as to that 'safe and effective' mantra so mindlessly repeated by the medical and media establishments, there is simply no number of repetitions that can magically turn this myth into truth. This vaccine was never designed to be effective, but rather lucrative. To make an effective vaccine, the manufacturers would need a viral sequence unique to the SARS-CoV2 'virus', and yet they don't; for there still isn't an isolated virus to sequence after an entire year of this 'pandemic'!

As the Off Guardian reported, when investigator Fran Leader questioned Pfizer they confirmed: "The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person."

From Off Guardian:

"People genuinely appear to believe that the COVID 19 vaccines have undergone clinical trials and have been proven to be both safe and effective. That belief is simply wrong.

“The main point is this. If you decide to have Pfizer and BioNTech’s experimental mRNA-based BNT162b2 (BNT) vaccine, or any other claimed COVID 19 vaccine for that matter, you are a test subject in a drug trial."

And this is exactly what myself and other independent voices have been warning for months now: This global vaccination campaign is a massive clinical trial, with the whole world as the testing ground and all of humanity the guinea pigs. And already we are seeing the side effects begin to pile up fast enough to see that we are indeed not yet dealing with a vaccine that has proven to be truly 'safe and effective.'

3 columns
2 columns
1 column