RE: RE: Thoughts on HF 20 "Velocity"- Yes to tokens, but no to mining.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Thoughts on HF 20 "Velocity"- Yes to tokens, but no to mining.

RE: Thoughts on HF 20 "Velocity"- Yes to tokens, but no to mining.

I would be ok with mining, but not if scrypt is the PoW - it would have to be something with no ASICs. Cryptonight or something else where not even GPUs have a significant edge. Aloo (f it's even possible) pooling would have to be disallowed. And the tokens would have to be only good for creating am account and non-transferrable. Basically, CPU mineable without any way that it could benefit botnets. That being said, for acquisition of a stake in a DAC like this one, I don't think that $5 is a substantial minimum barrier, especially of there was a category/app/something that the accountless folk who can't afford $5 could use to petition for a sponsor. Given that we are faced with the delicate question of how to increase adoption by two orders of magnitide without a comlarable reduction in quality of content (like reddit suffered when Digg imploded) we must proceed with caution.

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
Join the conversation now