Last week Thursday on Tucker Carlson he did a segment with Alex Berenson toward the end of his show where Berenson spoke of an increase of deaths among those twenty to fifty years old globally. Berenson said it was highly unusual to see such a high increase across that age group. He stated that here in the US some of those deaths could be explained away due to the increase number of suicides and drug deaths but does not account for them all nor would the same trend apply across other countries across the globe. Berenson went on to explain that he hated to say it, which was more likely spoken in that form to lessen the backlash, that there is only one thing all these deaths have in common and that's the vaccines. Tucker went on to ask him if people were looking into these high number of unexplained deaths globally whereas Berenson replied not that he knew of. Since they didn't know of anyone investigating these deaths I went on Tuckers site and sent him the information he needed to find those that were doing exactly that.
Instead of being outraged over the photos displayed of autopsy reports of those who have died following vaccine Tucker instead decides the focus should be on the study of dead dogs caused by research from Dr Fauci. His backdropped screamed out the word repugnant while he barked the world should be outraged. He shivered you with the frightful tale of dogs put in cages with their heads locked while untold numbers of sand fleas were set upon them to their deaths. Yes that is horrific, outrageous and even repugnant, given everything else Dr Fauci has managed to do to inflict great pain upon society I do agree he should be called out for all his evil deeds in a quest to remove him from office before he can do further damage to the world. You would think though, that having already highlighted this dastardly act of Fauci's last week, that the FDA's approval of vaccines for young children, given along with information he now readily has at his disposal of pictures depicting the damages being done by the vaccines to blood vessels and the organs of people after being vaccinated, that that would be of deeper concern to Americans knowing full well the implications such information could have upon hundreds, possibly thousands of kids across America, especially if mandated.
You might even be compelled to think that should have been the top story of the night not just on Tucker but Laura Ingraham's show...but no, kids walking out of a high school to demand a safer environment, Kerry's kiss butting up to China, Critical race theory, and an interview with Mike Pompeo came before any mention of the FDA's approval for vaccines for kids ages five to eleven. Once she finally got around to highlighting the segment on the FDA this is what transpired after focusing her guest speaker on what one FDA panelist had to say to day:
Panelist: We're never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it. That's just the way it goes. I do think we should vote to approve it.
Laura's response to that was:
It's, it's like you have to pass the bill to see what's in it, you have to give the shot to know if it works.
I'd give you the link to the video but from all appearances I guess the segment wasn't worthy of posting so you'd have to go watch the whole show until the end or skip to the end of the show. You can though go to Tucker's site and watch his outrage over the dogs.
The question here though wasn't if the vaccine works, the highlight should have been based on releasing a vaccine on young children whereas the short or long term consequences are unknown and those on an advisory committee felt completely comfortable shrugging their shoulders and saying in essence, "oh well that's just the way it goes, they get injured they get injured, if they die, they die."
Laura initially struggled a response to that, her voice trailing down as she spoke because she knew what she had to say was a deflection away from the truth of what he spoke, the issue of safety. In reality she didn't have to deflect away she merely had to say the vaccine has proven to be effective to thousands of people lessoning severe disease but that hasn't proven to be true across the board given the number of complaints filed on VAERS, until some of these issues are further investigated or longer term studies are done they shouldn't move forward with approval of such young children. As a matter of fact you could actually find yourself asking why Tucker, Hannity, or Laura aren't asking the hard question of why there are so many complaints filed on VAERS since the vaccination roll out. It's historic, there's never been any drug allowed to stay on the market with that many complaints filed against it without being pulled and investigated in the systems entire history.
The excuse can't be that there's no doctors/scientist/pathologist willing to speak out as there are hundreds of them popping up all across the globe. One very well qualified doctor in the US has been quite vocal on the roll out of the vaccines but he's only allowed on to speak in a specific agenda driven direction and cut off if he starts straying. Many others are used for the same tactic, short, sweet and to the point with a disclaimer of the vaccines have proven to work for severe disease so they aren't threaten to death after their appearance. Usually these driven agenda appearances have to do with the alternate treatments, it could be political link as we saw with DeSantis down in Florida and the Biden administration limiting his use of monoclonal drugs in early treatment or their opinions on drugs such as Ivermectin use, with of course the disclaimer they are no substitute for vaccination as they have been proven to stop severe disease.
That's highly questionable considering more people have died since vaccinations roll outs started than last year without a vaccine. There are so many people dying evidently they can't, in a county like mine with a seventy percent claimed vaccination rate, schedule a timely funeral for my grandkids great grandma who died of cancer last week. She's still on ice at the morgue. Her kids were just told they are backed up because of covid cases and can't give them a date when she can be buried. That is extremely unusual and I've never experienced such a thing in my entire life.
I tend to believe it's more profit driven than not wanting to stir hesitancy in people not to get vaccinated, though you can argue that one is being done to profit from the other because there is simply no excuse when it comes to children to hold such a reckless disregard.
When Fox News blares out "We Will Not Be Silenced" you can rest assured it's an outright lie.
Y