Part 7 - ID2020 under COVID-19 of the EXPOSÉ: BillGates-COVID-19-ID2020-WHO-CDC-BigPharma-Gavi-Rockefeller: Connecting the Dots


Part 7 - ID2020 under COVID-19

of the EXPOSÉ: BillGates-COVID-19-ID2020-WHO-CDC-BigPharma-Gavi-Rockefeller: Connecting the Dots

Introduction to this Exposé

Hello everyone,

This is a continuation of my exposé. In PART 1 - Bill Gates + Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation we saw how Bill Gates is not only a highly corrupt and evil individual thrusting his might to vaccinate every man, woman, and child on this planet, but also how he uses his billions and power and influence across a wide spectrum of alliances in order to push a greater agenda on the masses. In PART 2 - The CDC (Center for Disease Control) & PART 3 - The WHO (World Health Organization) we saw much of the same nefariousness. And in PART 4 - Big Pharma we saw how powerful and profitable the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world are and how much influence they have on academia, doctors, and health agencies and how they use that power to serve their profiteering agendas. In PART 5 - The Gavi Alliance we explored how the powerful Gavi Vaccine Alliances, spearheaded by Gates, uses its financial and political clout to strong-arm nations into donating billions and submitting to harmful vaccination programs. In PART 6 - The Rockefeller Foundation, I extensively demonstrated how the Rockefellers used their tremendous financial clout to essentially take over and corrupt the Western Medical Establishment; and also how they are currently positioning themselves with an action plan to essential impose an even more egregious system of medical tyranny on the back of COVID-19.

In this part, it is time to lay bare the various Biometric Digital ID systems that these corrupt powers want to coerce governments into using so that they can track everything about us, our Covid-19 status, our medical records, our movements, travel, our activity on social media, etc., etc.

And a the end of the exposé, I will connect the major dots from each and show you how they all tie into each other for the Greater Plan they have in store for us.

Note that this exposé is divided into the following parts:

PART 1 - Bill Gates + Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

PART 2 - The CDC (Center for Disease Control)

PART 3 - The WHO (World Health Organization)


PART 5 - The Gavi Alliance

PART 6 - The Rockefellers & The Rockefeller Foundation

PART 7 - ID2020 under COVID-19 (this post)

Conclusion & Call To Action


PART 7 – ID2020 under COVID-19


We may indeed be just at the beginning of the implementation of ID2020 — which includes forced vaccination, population reduction and total digital control of everybody, on the way to One World Order; and global financial hegemony — Full Spectrum Dominance, as the PNAC (Plan for a New American Century) likes to call it. - Peter Koenig

The quote from above is quite poignant and relevant to our times, to say the least.

If you don't know who Peter Koenig is, he is a migthy fine researcher, economist and geopolitical analyst.

He writes extensively for various publications and many of his articles can be accessed via

In fact, it was his article entitled The Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic: The Real Danger is “Agenda ID2020” that inspired me to write this exposé. It's a tremendous piece of reporting; and I'd encourage the reader to have a look at it.

In the title of Koenig's article, he makes reference that the real danger posed is that of "Agenda ID2020". And I couldn't agree more.

So, what I will attempt to do in this part of my exposé is to lay bare this precise "agenda" in its broader scope, its main participants, the way they are going about to implement it, and its potential implications on our basic rights and freedoms.


What is ID2020?

Firstly, I think it is critically important to mention that ID2020 should first and foremost be viewed as an OVERARCHING STRATEGY to gain complete control over individuals' lives via the introduction of a permanent, inescapable, ID system which will remove any bit of freedom and sovereignty we have.

Such kind of a system has often been described as a "Mark of the Beast" one, and with good reason. Revelation 13:15-16 of the bible does indeed prophesized as much:

The second beast [...] forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads - (Revelation 13:15-16)

While bible prophecies are up to much debate, the idea to remember here is that of the mark and the beast (i.e., who is imposing/imprinting it). Hitler was the beast during WWII when he literally marked millions of Jews for extermination.

Today, the beast doesn't refer to a single dictator the like of Adolf Hitler, but rather is an amalgamation of a group of parasitical "elite" class who see themselves as superior to us and who wish to impose their will and control over every aspect of our lives.

They go by different names:

They and their subservient puppets are embedded in nearly all countries and societies, i.e., in governments (national, state/provincial, and local), organizations, NGOs, multinational corporations (including Big Pharma), foundations (such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & the Rockefeller Foundation), and countless others.

They are also highly present in powerful supranational organizations such as the United Nations, the WHO (World Health Organization), The European Union, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) - all of which exert a tremendous amount of influence over nation states.

The powers-that-shouldn't-be are using the COVID-19 Pandemic as an excuse or cover to implement this sinister plan.

With the current global financial and fiat monetary regime coming to its inevitable end, they wish nothing more than to merge the new international financial/monetary system (which is most certainly already developed and practically ready-to-go) with that of an international biometric identification system for which they intend to not leave a single human soul out of.

Therefore, I equally think it is also important that we keep the upcoming financial/monetary system in mind when examining the biometric ID system, as they are both being designed to function as a greater system.

What are the specifics of ID2020?

Firstly, I must state that, though planning for ID2020 started much earlier, it really hit center-stage this past January in Davos, Switzerland at the World Economic Forum. The power players that attend this annual meeting not only comprise the "elites" I mentioned earlier, but also their puppets who follow their marching orders and are tasked with implementing them. These include the likes of the Vaccine God himself, Bill Gates (source), and organizations such as his vaccine alliance Gavi (sources: 1, 2) just to name a few.

Prior to the WEF event, there was a ID 2020 Summit that was announced and held on September 19, 2019 in New York city. Interestingly, this was less than a month prior to the infamous Event 201 planned simulation of a global coronavirus pandemic which also took place in New York city (on Oct. 18, 2019). Nice coincidence, eh?


Image source: Off-Grid Healthcare ID2020 Alliance: Global Mandatory Vaccinations + Biometric ID Integration

From its own website, the alliance states the following [emphasis added]:

For the one in seven people globally who lacks a means to prove their identity, digital ID offers access to vital social services and enables them to exercise their rights as citizens and voters and participate in the modern economy.

For the "one in seven" [billion] people, they are referring to those from impoverished and underdeveloped nations. Stated differently, those who are not easily connnected to their control-grids nor have bank accounts in their names.

Then they say that these people need to "exercise their rights as citizens and voters and participate in the modern economy".

Really? they can't participate in the economy without a digital ID? Haven't they been doing so for thousands of years already? What an insane statement and assertion. They are simply using the "modern economy" in this statement as a pretext to get them "on-grid" where they can ensure their exploitation along with the rest of us slaves.

But doing digital ID right means protecting civil liberties and putting control over personal data back where it the hands of the individual.

Really? Protecting your "civil liberties"? Which ones exactly? And more importantly, how?

They state that "control over personal data" should be put back in the "hands of the individual". This is absolutely absurd, unless they literally mean as a mark on their hands (or wrists). We all know that this critical data would NOT be placed in the hands of those individuals, but rather in a centralized database under their control and which could easily be vulnerable to hacking and exploitation by other parties. I mean, really? Do they really think that we are all that stupid? Does this stem from their superiority complex, or do they merely see us as sheep?

Every day, we rely on a variety of forms of identification to go about our lives: our driver’s license, passport, work badge and building access cards, debit and credit cards, transit passes, and more. But technology is evolving at a blinding pace and many of the transactions that require identification are today being conducted digitally. From e-passports to digital wallets, online banking to social media accounts, these new forms of digital ID allow us to travel, conduct business, access financial and health records, stay connected, and much more.

They are correct in that technology is evolving at a blinding pace and that a lot more of everything we do is being accessed and recorded in a digital fashion. However, many of these systems (such as passports for travel, cards for banking, transit passes, etc.) still, arguably, work perfectly fine as is.

Moreover, a lot of these needs and functions can be more honestly (and securely) stored on 'decentralized open-sourced blockchains'. Case in point, this expose is stored on the HIVE blockchain and accessible via the website as well as on the STEEM blockchain and via; while these websites could one day dissapear, the record on their respective blockchains are permanent and thus cannot be erased or destroyed by anyone (as could easily be the case with social medial giants like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter).

But, as it is the case in China and Silicon Valley, they much prefer a centralized environment which is much easier to control, censor, and corrupt.

So, why digitize everything?

Simple, by digitizing everything, it can all be inter-connected through CENTRALIZED systems even though individual parts are scattered across different ones (e.g., national ID, work IDs, driver's license, health records, etc.). In other words, it can give the ability to whomever is developing these centralized systems to access it all seamlessly.

We see this now with COVID-19, as they want to centralize health records so they can be cross-checked to grant access and permission for international air travel, returning to work, returning to school, accessing public transit, accessing certain venues, etc. (exactly as I described in the section Rockefeller 'National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan': - A Digital Medical Tyranny, forced Tracking, and Vaccinations from Part 6b of this exposé)

Most of the current tools are archaic, insecure, lack appropriate privacy protections and commoditize our data. But that’s about to change and ID2020 is leading the charge. We are businesses, nonprofits, governments and individuals...working in collaboration to ensure that the future of digital identity is, indeed, # goodID.

So, let's take a look at these nonprofits and partners who will make all this magic happen.

Who are the Partners of ID2020?


Screenshot taken on 2020-05-30 from

As we can see from the image above, we can see the usual suspects, namely: Bill Gates via Gavi and Microsoft and, notably, The Rockefeller Foundation, among others which I will expand upon later in this part.

The strategic/technical partners who appear on the image above comprise merely part of the larger alliance.

Of course, for such a grand digital ID plan to materialize (especially on a global scale) would require the participation of governments, supranational organizations, multinational corporations, and others. As the article ID2020 Alliance: Global Mandatory Vaccinations + Biometric ID Integration from Off-Grid Healthcare puts it:

An alliance of multinational companies, global consulting firms, including Gavi or Vaccine Alliance, Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, etc. has been formed to provide a “holistic and market-based approach” to help governments of the world provide a “good national ID” to “prove who you are” because it is “a fundamental and universal human right.”

They will do this in conjunction with government-funded mandatory vaccinations. What could possibly go wrong?

Mandatory vaccinations. I believe this is a hidden, or unstated, part of their digital "Good" ID agenda. One that is more than troubling, to say the least given all that has been revealed in this comprehensive exposé.

I must not forget to add an "honorable mention" in that of an organization that is quite central to this grander plan, yet is barely receiving any attention or coverage, namely that of CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations). Highlighting a few points from an excellent article entitled After the Lockdown: A Global Coronavirus Vaccination Program… by a brilliant journalist (Prof. Michel Chossudovsky from will serve this purpose [emphasis added]:

What is the next step in the evolution of the COV-19 Crisis?
The lead entity for the novel coronavirus vaccine initiative is the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) an organization sponsored and financed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Note the chronology: The development of the 2019 nCoV vaccine was announced at the Davos World Economic Forum (WEF) a week prior to the official launching by the WHO of a Worldwide Public Health Emergency (January 30) at a time when the number of “confirmed cases” Worldwide (outside China) was 150 (including 6 in the US).

The pandemic was launched by the WHO on March 11. And five days later, barely covered by the media, the first tests involving human volunteers were conducted in Seattle on March 16.

CEPI is seeking a “monopoly” role in the vaccination business the objective of which is a “global vaccine project”, in partnership with a large number of “candidates”. It announced funding for its existing partnership with Inovio and The University of Queensland (Australia). In addition, CEPI confirmed (January 23) its contract with Moderna, Inc. and the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has been instrumental in waging the fear and panic campaign across America: “Ten Times Worse than Seasonal Flu”.

The article goes on in great detail about how Gates and the other bad actors such as Big Pharma (including GlaxoSmithKline) are integral to this plot. I strongly suggest the reader have a look to get a more detailed perspective of CEPI's role in this whole plandemic.

Just think how easy it would be to strong-arm individuals into getting a vaccination, for without it he or she would be deprived of all societal services listed earlier.

See how seamlessly these all get tied together?

Now, while some would argue that such a nefarious plan would be nearly impossible to pull off since it would require the complicity of governments and other key institutions, not to mention the masses of people themselves, that is exactly what they are doing. I will shed further light on this, as the 7th part of this exposé continues to unravel hereunder.

Which Biometric ID Systems are currently in the works? Who is developing them? And which countries are facilitating and getting ready to impose them on their citizens?

As was showcased in Part 6 (The Rockefellers) of this exposé, these powers-that-shouldn't-be often go to great lengths and use a myriad of agents to implement their agendas.

They do so over the course of decades, sometimes centuries.

So, we should expect the same with this current agenda (of a Biometric ID System for all).

Of course, they cannot implement such grandiose plans all at once, for citizen push back and political hesitancy would prevent them from doing so.

Rather, their approach is one of step by step, brick by brick. For example, which each crisis they acquire more and more power. We've seen this with the events of 9/11 and the USA Patriot Act. As the former mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel once said:


With the events of 9/11 (which contrary to the "official" narrative is an event any critical mind would view as preplanned) Americans rights and freedoms were largely eroded, many irreversibly lost forever. The same can be said about other nations even though the "attacks" did not take place on their soil. The whole crisis was a manufactured one to create the "War on Terrorism" that would be used to justify these egregious thefts of peoples liberties, rights and freedoms, not to mention the enriching of the Military-Industrial-Complex who benefited from it all at the expense of the US taxpayer.

My point is that whatever is missing for them to complete their agendas, they fabricate crises in order to get what they want. This is classic PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION. The Solution is what they want; and the way they achieve it is to create the Problem in the first place that will foment a Reaction by the masses (who will subsequently demand a Solution). There are many examples in my previous exposé on Mind Control Techniques used by the Elites.

While it is debatable that the COVID-19 Global Pandemic is a fabricated crisis or whether it is not, that is not what is paramount anyway. What is, however, is the RESPONSE of governments and others (such as Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, and the WHO, the British Government, to name a few) around the world.

It is not that difficult to see how these parties respond to the crisis. One simply needs to look at their actions, whose narratives they are parroting, who they are partnering with, and what rules and laws they are changing and enacting.

For the purpose of this section, we will focus on the partners. In other words, who they are using to develop these Biometric ID systems of centralization and control.

As they know there will be push back if a single entity is tasked with developing such a system, their preferred modus operandi consists of getting multiple parties involved with its development, similar to how they are doing so with a COVID-19 vaccine.

So, with all that out of the way, let's finally have a look at who is in the mix for this new beast system.

The Contenders

For each of these contenders, I will also list the companies, governments, organizations, and universities they are affiliated with in order to provide a clear picture and understanding of where they may be implemented.

I will also provide links to sources/references so that the reader may learn more about each in a more detailed context, as for here I want to keep it as brief as possible so as to not confuse the reader.

Contender #1: COVI-PASS (Vcode)

  • also called a Digital Health Passport, or ePassport.
  • In their own words: - biometrically accessed on a mobile phone, or held on a key fob or RFID; - Digital Health Passport which displays your Covid-19 test history and immunoresponse and other relevant health information
  • Characteristics: - To track Covid-19 test history and immuno response (which I infer as antibodies - which I referenced in Part 6b). - A Vcode stores: passport & national I.D. information, health records, Work ID, travel tickets, event tickets, payment methods, a crypto wallet, and more
  • Affiliations: British cybersecurity firm VST Enteprises, UK Government, European Commission (awarded 'Seal of Excellence' from), United Nations (projects)
  • Additional Sources & References: 1
  • Images:




Contender #2: iRespond

  • iRespond,
  • In their own words: - iRespond is an international non-profit dedicated to solving the identity problem using a privacy protecting digital biometric identity solution.; - the iRespond digital identity solution primarily relies on iris biometrics; - other modalities, such as finger or face can be used instead, or in combination with iris; - an encrypted biometric template is created from their iris scan and a randomly assigned 12-digit number.
  • Characteristics: - focus seems to be on third-world countries, as many projects are being conducted there; - tracking of those vaccinated for Covid-19.
  • Affiliations: ID2020, WHO, CDC, Microsoft, John Hopkins, and more
  • Additional Sources & References: 1, 2, 3
  • Images:


Contender #3: ID2020

  • ID2020,
  • In their own words: -ID2020 alliance partners work together – through a transparent governance model - to set technical requirements, fund and implement digital identity projects, and develop the supporting evidence required by policymakers, regulators, companies or individuals.; -Identity is vital for politcal, economic, and social opportunity.; -The ability to prove one’s identity is a fundamental and universal human right.; - digital ID offers access to vital social services and enables them to exercise their rights as citizens and voters and participate in the modern economy.;
  • Characteristics: - a hub for establishing technical parameters of the Biometric identification program; - provides a substantial amount of funding from partners to various governments (at all levels), suprationational organizations (such as the WHO, United Nations); - Currently has trial/pilot programs in Bangladesh, with refugees, and in Austin Texas (for homeless people) using a digital identity platform called MyPass.; - Accenture's prototype identity systems runs on Microsoft Azure cloud computing platform and is designed to use fingerprints and iris biometrics, among other means.; - seems to be in line with UN Sustainable Development Goal 16.9.
  • Affiliations: Gavi, the Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, Accenture, Simprints, Hyperledger (blockchain), the United Nations, University of California (Berkeley), and others.
  • Additional Sources & References: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  • Images:


Contender #4: Simprints

  • Simprints,
  • In their own words: - the site is actually quite vague in what they do and offer but seem to focus on ID systems for "humanitarian" use
  • Characteristics: - Identification tool consists of a biometric fingerprint scanner device added to a mobile phone; also has facial recognition scanning from phone; - vaccine tracking; - seems focused on third-world countries such as Bangladesh
  • Affiliations: Gavi, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Microsoft, USAID, UKAID, Google UK, Trinity College, and many more.
  • Additional Sources & References: 1, 2
  • Images:



Contender #5: OnFido




Other Contenders:

Rather than offerring my thoughts and analysis on each of these contenders, I will refrain from doing so for now. I want to give the reader the opportunity to have an objective look at these in the broader context which I have presented in this post and explore each through the sourced links provided for each (as well as through their own sources).

Final Thoughts for this section

In the final part of this comprehensive exposé's Conclusion & Call To Action, I will offer my thoughts and analysis about the contenders listed above and how they tie into the grander scheme of things. I will also connect some major/important "dots" to give the reader a clearer view of what I believe is happening with this broad based plan.

To conclude this part, I'd like to mention that the development and implementation of a Biometric Identification System is not one that is exclusively geared towards COVID-19 tracking, but will be one that will also serve as a means to database and track every single citizen so as to exert yet more power over their lives, particularly with their involvement in society, work, school, the financial system, travel, leisure, and so on. The idea being, to essentially strip them of their rights and freedoms.

I'd like to re-iterate the powers-that-shouldn't-be do not implement such systems in a one-shot fashion.

Rather, with each and every crisis, they take the opportunity to leverage more power towards their goals.

In other words, while they may not see their desired national or global Biometric ID systems put into effect this year or next, you can rest assured that they will nonetheless pilot these systems in third-world countries were they will face less resistance and even attempt to do so in developed countries such as in the UK.

They will meticulously measure the levels of push back by citizens, levels of cooperation by governments, academia, and other organizations in order to more easily pass their desired measures upon the next crisis-du-jour.


Once completed, I intend to put everything together in a single PDF downloadable file for easier sharing and distribution.

Stay tuned for the final part of this exposé as I intend to post it within the next week.

Comments and re-blogs are more than welcome!

In Peace & Liberty,


3 columns
2 columns
1 column