The Cyberspace quick guide for "modern" politicians

You can hate GWB all you want for all the reason you want but censorship.

It started with Obama. First to hide the drone war and thuesday kill list results.

To then expand mercyless and remorselessly during the Tea Party Insurgency.

Then it went full bore on CO2 (plant food) and pedo protection.

Of course it was shadowed by "antisemitism/antizionism/BDS or what ever it was".

What I am trying to say is that it's easy to thing that the cyberspace is real :

KILL MIKE PENCE.

It has no meaning IRL (mike pence is a traitor will certainly be confirmed in a few hours).

What I mean is that pretending to want to defeat the "gafam" or the IN-Q-TEL ops with laws is stupid.

Secondly you can't win and control us.

What I mean is that the best solution is better, faster, free, providing income centralized or decentralized plateform.

Facebook drive to implement real name policy, look, now... for real republicans in america...

As said it's impossible to say what may become illegal to say in 20 years.

And saying that isn't a conspiracy or distopian future speculation.

BUT AGAIN IT'S JUST THE CYBERSPACE...

the HARDWARE on which it runs IS THE REAL KEY TO DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY !!!

the software will follow...

and that's the thing it's illusory to thing to regain sovereignty on owned silicium...

I think it's evident...

this sovereignty will be fleeting like sand.

For example twatter may not censor your political opinions contrary to TPTB in D.C. because of laws, but as the hardware is powned, if it's really against their interests, shut down.

think about it.

illusory sovereignty is worst than known captivity.

(ps it means that they (silicon valley) have to be treated as enemy combatant...).

Join the conversion now