Each time when a new disruptive technology appears on the trading exchanges (stock- or crypto-) it gets a controversial perception. From one point of view, the companies offering ground-braking technologies have a chance to simply destroy its competitors following traditional approach to the business by offering services /goods of higher value for a cheaper price. However, a camp of traditional technology supporters have a reasonable point – it is still unclear that this technology will be popular and gain mass adoption due to XYZ reasons.
We assume that the current cryptoboom is similar to a boom of railroads in 19th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_Mania + a number of other examples presented in this great article https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/062315/five-largest-asset-bubbles-history.asp) or even the most recent one – DotCom companies boom in the late 90-ies.
Let’s analyze the performance of stock of 2 giant companies – Amazon and Microsoft.
The Amazon example
Take a look at the chart of AMZN stock price (weekly, June, 1997 – October, 1999):
Take a look at the chart of AMZN stock price (weekly, January, 2000 – December, 2002):
Take a look at the chart of AMZN stock price (weekly, June, 1997 – December, 2017):
Take a look at the projected profit rate for a given invested sum at the beginning of the cycle:
The Microsoft example
Take a look at the chart of MSFT stock price (weekly, March, 1997 – December, 2000):
Take a look at the chart of MSFT stock price (weekly, January, 2000 – December, 2002):
Take a look at the chart of MSFT stock price (weekly, March, 1986 – December, 2017):
Take a look at the projected profit rate for a given invested sum at the beginning of the cycle:
Findings & Conclusion
What these 2 stocks had in common in 90-ies? They represented a disruptive sector – IT. Software development and Sales through the Internet. Initially, both these 2 companies were cash-flow negative (the basic P/E indicator also was non-existent for them). At that stage, investors in these 2 companies were betting on the growth of demand on IT services and products and a successful accomplishment of the projects by the teams of these 2 companies. Both of them have experienced gigantic volatility of own equities prices. Both of them have awarded their investors with outstanding returns. And guess which investment approach was the best to profit from this asset appreciation cycle? Obviously, HODL! Hodlers of AMZN and MSFT equities are currently driving their Lambos (and even probably stacking some quality crypto picks to ensure their future generations will enjoy the same prosperity level as they have now).
Just imagine, that you could constantly add (monthly) to your initial investment in the 90-ies and how big would be your portfolio now! XX XXX % returns!
Assets Gem picking
Of course there were numerous investment failures during DotCom bubble as majority of these projects completely bankrupted! But even this remark signifies an importance to find your own Crypto Gem for Eternal HODLingm, finding your CryptoAMZN or CryptoMSFT!
We have briefly covered our current portfolio of high-quality crypto assets in our article here: https://steemit.com/crypto/@p2port.com/crypto-portfolio-high-quality-crypto-assets-for-long-term-growth-created-on-11-january-2018
PS
Usefull links (CryptoExchanges):
Your P2Port.com!