<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>https://ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 17:52:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ecency.com/created/spreasheets/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[An XLSref Investigation: Testing Excel's VAR()]]></title><description><![CDATA[How can 5 numbers less than 100 lead to a sample variance over 1000? Is Excel 2003's VAR() bugged? XLSref investigates. Images are edited screen captures from either Excel 2003 or LeoThreads. Edits made]]></description><link>https://ecency.com/@magnacarta/an-xlsref-investigation-testing-excel-s-var</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecency.com/@magnacarta/an-xlsref-investigation-testing-excel-s-var</guid><category><![CDATA[hive-167922]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[magnacarta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 05:44:27 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/DQmWnyw1TYzTy1W8P1h3ZqvCbDKLcsHzR5AeZTTPQGaE7PC/an_xlsref_investigation_testing_excel_2003_s_var_.png" length="0" type="image/png"/></item></channel></rss>