<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>https://ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 19:15:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ecency.com/created/proof0fwork/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Bitcoin bad or good for the environment?]]></title><description><![CDATA[The environmental impact of Bitcoin Proof of Work. I was dismayed to read that Bitcoin proof of work consensus, the decentralized network of computers confirming transactions and validating the accuracy]]></description><link>https://ecency.com/@shortsegments/bitcoin-bad-or-good-for-the-environment</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecency.com/@shortsegments/bitcoin-bad-or-good-for-the-environment</guid><category><![CDATA[hive-167922]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[shortsegments]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:37:15 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/2bP4pJr4wVimqCWjYimXJe2cnCgnBPBED6EdgTfcZ5g?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>