<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>https://ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:00:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ecency.com/created/philosophyofreligion/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Rowe: The fallacy the Cosmological Argument doesn't commit]]></title><description><![CDATA[William L. Rowe in his paper, "The Cosmological Argument," makes the point that the proponent of the cosmological argument (CA) does not commit the fallacy of composition as is often assumed.]]></description><link>https://ecency.com/@ijm/rowe-the-fallacy-the-cosmological-argument-doesn-t-commit</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecency.com/@ijm/rowe-the-fallacy-the-cosmological-argument-doesn-t-commit</guid><category><![CDATA[philosophyofreligion]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[ijm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:04:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/368La1qZAv72cKioMb8NTT418Go2yztttdpz3m1kdAn9P4zR8p8gGkuz1Bdx92dzBBjqBsg54cfTBVLbQ5QXkGbY?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>