<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>https://ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 09:36:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ecency.com/created/linearity/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Argument against (completely) proportionally linear effective voting Steem Power]]></title><description><![CDATA[Once there was n^2 Once upon a time, rewards on Steem were calculated by factoring in the voting accounts SP according to the follwoing function: effective_voting_sp = (actual_sp) ^ 2 This describes how]]></description><link>https://ecency.com/@personz/argument-against-completely-proportionally-linear-effective-voting-steem-power</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecency.com/@personz/argument-against-completely-proportionally-linear-effective-voting-steem-power</guid><category><![CDATA[steem]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[personz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2018 12:02:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>