New Study Shows No Reduction In COVID19 Transmission Due to COVID Shots: "sole reliance on vaccination... needs to be re-examined"

A new scientific study published in The European Journal of Epidemiology demonstrates that
Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States. The data clearly shows that the experimental COVID shots do not stop transmission of SARS CoV2 between 'vaccinated' people and concludes: "The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined,".

There is a world of confusion and counter narratives circulating around the efficacy of the various experimental COVID19 shots at present. In particular, there seems to be a big disagreement in society regarding whether or not the shots prevent transmission of the virus or whether they only minimise the harm done once a person is sick. All of the data I have personally seen shows that the shots do NOT prevent transmission, however, I have heard people claiming the opposite numerous times. This new study makes clear that the shots DO NOT prevent transmission, based on globally available statistics.

Perhaps it is not surprising that there is such disagreement, when large pharmaceutical corporations essentially operate on the same business model as organised crime gangs. When 'science' can be bought and paid for by bribing people from an almost unquenchable source of funding, such as the pharma groups have - in no small part due to their exploitation of COVID19, we need to very carefully examine any claims that are made in support of their products.

Some quotes from the new study give a sense of the simplicity and clarity of their findings:

At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases i

They even found that heavily vaccinated countries had somewhat WORSE levels of COVID19 than those with less takeup of the shots. This is totally in agreement with what I identified weeks ago, namely that the shots appear to be CREATING COVID19 cases and even deaths!

In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.

A look at the US States showed the same pattern, namely that the states with the highest 'vaccine' uptake, often had the worst rates of transmission:

Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.

The study attempted to account for certain issues, such as the fact that coverage from the shots takes 2 weeks and perhaps also that high levels of cases might drive vaccine uptake in the short term, by including a 1 month lag into the data analysis - however, this did not change the findings.

The conclusion also mentions the recent, large Israeli study which I recently wrote about that shows that natural immunity from prior COVID19 infection is hugely more protective than any of the experimental COVID19 shots:

in a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39% [6], substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96% [7]. It is also emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus

The study concludes with simple advice which matches what the data from hundreds of years has long since confirmed - HYGIENE IS SUPERIOR TO VACCINES IN MOST CASES:

In summary, even as efforts should be made to encourage populations to get vaccinated it should be done so with humility and respect. Stigmatizing populations can do more harm than good. Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (e.g., the importance of basic public health hygiene with regards to maintaining safe distance or handwashing, promoting better frequent and cheaper forms of testing) needs to be renewed in order to strike the balance of learning to live with COVID-19 in the same manner we continue to live a 100 years later with various seasonal alterations of the 1918 Influenza virus.

I have long written about the reality that in most cases, where you are presented with a graph that alleges to show the effectiveness of traditional vaccines in lowering illness, something FUNDAMENTAL is omitted. The graphs nearly always begin a few years before the introduction of vaccines, whether it be Polio, Measles or any other. What they omit to show is that the numbers of cases was nosediving hugely for decades prior to the invention of the vaccines due to ever improving sanitation and hygiene. As hygiene goes up, viral disease goes down and is the number one driver - vaccines have only ever made a tiny difference at the end of a huge drop and then been given the credit, mostly by those who make money from doing so.

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

Read My User Guide for Hive Here