This content was deleted by the author. You can see it from Blockchain History logs.

MARSH V ALABAMA; SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Privately owned corporations, open to the public, cannot discriminate by denying constitutionally protected speech.

“Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion.”

The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.

In order to enable the public to be properly
informed, their information must be uncensored.

marsh v alabama cover.jpg