Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.
Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.
The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.
The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002.
http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=52
http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/memberstates.html
...
Esoteric Agenda: Agenda 21
The sustainable goal is the elimination of the middle class. The world cannot support 6+ billion people. The plan behind Sustainable Development includes population control. It is a program for land control, education control and population control. The leaders of the Sustainable Movement said that the world human population should not exceed 500 million people. That is a 93% reduction in today's population. In 1992 while the Rio conference ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Conference_on_Sustainable_Development ) was going on, George Bush, then president, was there. He was just off shore in Prince Charles' yacht where he executed the Agenda 21 protocol on behalf of the US and brought it back to Washington DC. Within a year Bill Clinton by Executive Order, established the President's Council for Sustainable Development ( http://clinton2.nara.gov/PCSD/ ).
In 1993 Bill Clinton set up the President Council on Sustainable Development and one of the dictates for Agenda 21 is that every country in the world should set up a National Council to oversee the implementation of Agenda 21. I have listened to Gorbachev explain: "We are writing a new set of 10 or 15 Commandments to replace the original 10" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones ). Which one of the 10 do you think these guys don't like?
Thou shalt not lie?
Thou shalt not steal?
Thou shalt not covet?
Because I will tell you what. These people have lied to us, they're in the process of stealing all of this nation's natural resources, and they covet everything you have left.
To explain the map ( www.watersworld.us/agenda-21-map-thmb52b.jpg ). The red are areas that will be off limits to human beings. If you live there, you won't. Yellow areas are for major control of all human activity. If you live there, you won't. Black dots are the smart growth zones, where human beings are to be stacked and packed in small living units along rail tracks. The smart growth program also only has jobs assigned and children cared for by the state.
And in conjunction with Codex Alimentarius, food will be limited and water consumption will be decreased to 10 gallons per day per person. That is over a 90% reduction in people's average daily water consumption. And along with shortages of food and water, the food we will be provided with will be genetically manipulated and nutrient deficient. Genetic manipulation of food causes complications in metabolizing and utilizing food for energy.
In January 2003 scientists reported that the gene sequence of the inserted genes into crops had actually changed their order. They had re-scrambled, so that genetic inserts are not stable. Another laboratory confirmed this and found that it changed the same varieties in different ways, so not only is it unstable and changing, it is not even uniform in the way it is changing. This is incredibly
dangerous. Nutrient deficiencies due to Codex's planned vitamin and mineral ban will cause billions of preventable diseases. Both of these will ultimately lead to billions of deaths.
In 1970 just three years after the publication of the Iron Mountain Report, which calls for , if we are going to create a world government we can no longer use war as a mechanism to cause fear amongst populations and therefore allow us to control the behavior of populations through fear. And they settled on, in 1967, in their publication called the Iron Mountain Report, the Environmental Holocaust. In 1970, 3 years after that publication the Council of Foreign Relations ( http://www.cfr.org/ / http://www.chathamhouse.org/ ) began to publish a series of articles describing ecological holocaust that was facing the world and in this particular issue, the first issue done by George Keenan, to prevent a world disaster it sums up in three points that the eco-crisis is a global threat so great that it endangers all of life on earth. Aurelio Peccei who actually created the Club of Rome ( http://www.clubofrome.org/ ), and is in the inner, inner circle of the global elitists in 1991 stated that while searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming and the like would fit the bill. All of these dangers are caused by human intervention. The real enemy then is humanity itself ( http://www.amazon.com/The-First-Global-Revolution-Council/dp/0679738258 The book itself was printed in 1991 but the sentence in question is referring to something that occurred ~20+ years prior).
Let's take a look at Al Gore's award winning and Nobel Peace Prize movie An Inconvenient Truth ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0497116/ ).
It will shake you to your core, If you love your planet, If you love your children, You have to see this film.
If you look at the 10 hottest years ever measured, they have all occurred in the last 14 years and the hottest of all was 2005. We are causing global warming. This is really not a political issue so much as a moral issue. Temperature increases are taking place all over the world and that is causing stronger storms. Is it possible that we should prepare against other threats besides terrorists?
The Arctic is experiencing faster melting. If this were to go, sea level world wide would go up 20 feet. This is what would happen in Florida. Around Shanghai home to 40 million people. The area around Culcutta - 60 million. Here's Manhattan, the World Trade Centre Memorial would be under water. Think of the impact of a couple of thousand refugees and then image one hundred million. Those who deny global warming are just flat out wrong, Helen Goodman from the Boston Globe wrote 'Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with holocaust deniers'.
Scientists silenced for questioning the threat of global warming. I've had several friends who have essentially been told if you speak out on climate change, you must do so as citizens. If you do so through our organization, our institution, you will essentially be fired. Once you realize how many holes there are in the consensus solution you may begin to open up your mind to the other side of the global warming debate as a whole. The only consensus I am aware of is that it is warming in the last century. They completely ignore the fact that there is this thing called the Oregon Petition that was signed by 19,000 professionals and scientists who don't agree with the idea that we are causing climate change. I can't tell you how many calls I have received from parents saying their kids are now being shown an Inconvenient Truth completely unchallenged not just in science class but in art and math classes. I have to speak out and say that the science we have is still incomplete and the science we are being told by the IPPC ( http://www.ipcc.ch/ ) is really incorrect science.
Lets put this to you bluntly. Global warming is a complete fallacy. All Gore received a Grammy and the Nobel Peace Prize for a film that is filled with holes and mis-truths.
Ice cores taken 2,000 meters below the surface have enabled us to look at the last 160,000 years. We believe that in Greenland, the medieval warming period was about one and a half degrees warmer on average than today.
And they also show consistently warmer temperatures thousands of years ago before man made green house gasses existed.
You can see that in the period between 4,000 years ago and back to the period 2,000 years ago, which is actually the Roman Age, the temperatures have been decreasing in Greenland by two and a half degrees.
Al Gore is made out to be a revolutionary figure attempting to save the planet, which is quite true, he just doesn't mention the fact that saving the earth does not involve you. According to his agenda, it will result in massive land repossessions and extreme limitations of food and water and fossil fuels for the public. And please note that Al Gore is a sustainable developer. The Global warming lie is very popular today because it receives major media coverage and has an attractively titled goal of 'saving the planet'. But how does this tie in with Agenda 21?
The result of the 1992 Earth Summit Conference in Rio de Janeiro was the Kyoto Treaty ( http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php ). The Kyoto Treaty states that every country must drastically reduce the use of fossil fuels by mandate of the United Nations ( http://www.un.org/en/ ).
Bill Clinton) Concentrations of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere are at their highest levels in more than 200,000 years. If the trend is not changed, scientists expect the seas to rise 2 feet or more over the next century. Island chains such as the Maldives will disappear from the map unless we reverse the predictions.
And as of June 2007, 172 nations and other government entities have ratified the Treaty. And if you were wondering how this ties into putting the earth's priority above human survival in accordance with pagan beliefs, every country's deadline for the implementation of Agenda 21 and the kyoto Treaty is in 2012. And if this wasn't enough, when the Pentagon was damaged in 911, they set a goal to have a completely new and improved Pentagon in December 2012 ( http://www.azicri.org/Default.aspx?pageId=1101701&eventId=530614&EventViewMode=EventDetails ).
So CODEX Alimentarius ( http://www.codexalimentarius.org/ ) goes into effect at the end of 2009 which gives it three years for the Codex regulations on food to start the process of creating billions of preventable diseases and deaths. When citizens of every nation are dying of starvation and diseases and fear for their lives because of global warming and major catastrophes, they will do what the public has been proven to do in times of great peril. They will beg for their government to step in and do something.
How are they going to get you to join the new economy? They are going to say, "we have a solution". You see one of the tricks of the Illuminati is they create a problem and then they provide a solution when you beg them to. And pray tell, what will the United Nations suggest when there is a global problem? They will demand a global government, a New World Order, Exactly as the Maya, Hopi, Kali Yuga and many other pagan civilizations prophesied.
By 2012 the Kyoto Treaty, Agenda 21, CODEX Alimentarius and the new Pentagon will be fully operational to enforce a New World Order (once they decide to trigger the next phase). And the New World Religion is obvious, we will all worship the earth, Gaia, the mother goddess we saved from extinction from global warming.
We will be told that to keep from repeating the mistakes that we made in the past, we must hold the earth in higher regard than humans, just as pagan traditions require.
This is too obvious to ignore. It is right in front of our faces, yet we still refuse to see it. Why do you think the United Nations are consistently trying to disarm the public and the nations? They don’t want us to be capable of fighting back. One poof of this is in the film released by the UN called ‘Armed to the Teeth: The Worldwide Plague of Small Arms’ ( http://films.com/id/5967/Armed_to_the_Teeth_The_Worldwide_Plague_of_Small_Arms.htm )where it demonizes gun ownership. It is also shown in the Freedom from War Policy ( http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html ) put in place by JFK in 1961. President John Kennedy went to the United Nations September 1961 and he presented the US Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World during a speech and he said this is the official program of the United States of America. It is a disarmament program, and it calls for the US to turn over its military to the UN. Let that sit for a second. It calls for the US to turn over its military to the United Nations. The program ends by saying progressive controlled disarmament would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN peace force. The UN would have all military power.
This policy outlines some pretty scary scenarios when you understand what it reads. It calls for the disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever, other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a UN Peace Force. This clearly shows that the UN is calling for all military power to be under their control.
Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armament in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process. Strategic delivery vehicles reduced. Arms and armed forces will be reduced and all the while UN peace keeping powers would be strengthened.
A United Nations peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace. Establishing of a permanent international peace force within the UN and depending upon the findings of an experts’ commission, a halt in the production of chemical, biological and radiological weapons and a reduction of the existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses... Peaceful uses of chemical biological or radiological weapons?? Do you see how they are perverting the word ‘peace’ and making this policy seem unilaterally good? There is no other way to read this publication. It clearly states that all nations will hand over all their military forces to a Global United Nations Military.