Bret Weinstein has often, quite succinctly, pointed out the two ways that people use the word "consensus."
One is a consensus that came through emergent order. That it's been challenged and scrutinized and it's emerged as a theory by the scientific definition and that the discipline works within that framework. He used the example of plate tectonics in geology. Yes, people can still offer opposing theories to plate tectonics; but, that's a very steep hill to climb.
You can also get a consensus by threatening anybody who says anything different. You can get a team of rocket scientists together and ask them if a rocket is safe, hold them all at gun point and demand a "yes" answer. You'll surely get a consensus.
The latter is the kind of consensus that the censorship of these tech companies are trying to push.
Instagram and Twitter have decided that sharing a chart from a peer reviewed study that showed that biological men are physically stronger than women was hate speech.
This is a clash of two consensuses. Collegial l biological men are generally stronger than biological women. Sex is not a cultural construct, it is a product of biology. These are as close to biological facts as you can get. This is the consensus that tech companies are censoring and calling "hate speech."
Beyond that, this is saying that, under some circumstances, stating biological fact can be hate speech.
The consensus that the censors want is one forged by force, intimidation, and de-platforming as to make a lie seem like the truth.