The metaphor of chess perfectly shows what I tell you, maybe we don't even disagree. The Chess Grandmaster can even throw the table aside if he wishes, he is free to do all the regulatory moves, and even

Agree with you. Although I believe that the repetition of a thought through different words can lead the reader to a deep understanding of the subject by changing perception, and not by tautology.

Yes, the point is to realize that the comfort zone is a mental state, and not really an zone, as the name seems to indicate. In a way it is like personal space, wherever you are, it will accompany you.

Also, I totally agree with the 8 founding pillars of the community.

Wow! That is excellent news, thank you very much for the support, I am grateful, it is really appreciated.

They are the same when talking about experience and not science. Unless you don't know what you experience.

I don't say that there are no circumstances that limit our freedom. I speak of free will, not absolute freedom. Your framework for action is limited by your current state of circumstances, however, you

If you were willing to share the information, in a hypothetical case, and I trust your testimony, there is no reason why we cannot determine it.

More than a feeling I would say it is a perception. I perceive that I have freedom when I do any action. Being able to feel free or not. I can feel that I have no freedom and still perceive that I have

The culture war is simply the logical next step of the cold war, it is its continuation by technological means. What we are seeing is the evolution/decay (blue/red pill), or rather, change (gray pill),

I describe the essence as what it perceives, so that everything that changes does, except the fact that we perceive that it changes. We can say that someone is quiet or not, depending on the circumstances,

Sure buddy.

Sorry I don't go to the subject. But thank you very much for the generous delegation of Steem Power, it really is appreciated. Seriously, very thanks. Regards!

Interesting reflection about emptiness. Indeed, the term is usually interpreted as nothing, because it is viewed from the point of view of the absence of something stable and not of the presence of something

Thank you for the comment, for the question and for the reestem, it really is appreciated. I don't think I have a definition for myself, either at the most superficial or the deepest level. I believe that

Thanks! The difference between virtue and morality is that morality is acting based on the manners, as you say, of a society, doing the socially acceptable according to manners or customs, the traditionally

Right. Agree with you. Although I don't think AI has free will, just seems to have it.

Free will exists if there is a possibility of change, if there is movement, and as is evident to the senses, movement exists, therefore there is change, therefore there is free will. If everything was

What you say happens because people don't have self-control and discipline, it is because people don't have liberty, although they do have free will.

I'm very much on the same page as you, and as for me, what happens in society is a silent progress, because these things you say have always been happening, only now they are being revealed to the general