It does demonstrate that I am not pejoratively singling you out as somehow incompetent. However, to give you the benefit of a very broad and deep doubt, what expertise do you claim to judge the competence of candidates? Saying I don't feel you have any specific competence isn't an insult. It is an observation that I feel competent to make due to our long and written correspondence. You may disagree, which I do expect, given your demonstrable hubris and claims of immunity to every fault humanity is subject to.

My own views on your competence are so disparate as to be diametrically opposed, and, because I do not mean that as an insult, I point out that my own competence by my judgment is no different than that I make of you. If you can make of that forthright statement of assessment that both you and I meet into an insult, then you must expect me to be some sort of masochist. In truth I am merely honest about my access to factual information, rather than the propaganda we are fed by deceivers intentionally misleading us, and I reckon neither of us has intrigued to ferret out the facts concealed by our deceivers.

Rather, you are irrationally possessed of the highest opinion of yourself, and can only consider any assessment of you as anything less than superwoman to be an insult.

"...I can't reason to logic what unqualified looks like."

Yes. No. Maybe. It is difficult to know what you mean by a statement so grammatically tortured.