we need individual downvotes on proposals rather than blanket downvoting with the return proposal.

This was one of my recommendations as well, as CBRS funded renovating a classroom with expenditures of ~.1% of Valueplan's, and they should not have to secure ~$65M worth of stake weight to fund such a small project (which wasn't funded through the DHF at all, but I felt was a good example of the kinds of projects folks would like to see come from the DHF).

Another I consider necessary is that stake can only be spent out of the DHF once. Each of us has a proportionate stake in the DHF to our stake in Hive tokens, and once we vote to expend that portion of our stake in the DHF, we should no longer have a say in how others spend their portion of the DHF. This, I believe, would cause people to more carefully consider voting for spending the DHF funds, and would concomitantly set a higher bar for beneficence of proposals in return for providing funding.