"...it's not even evil it's just delta neutral and completely based on profits."

My own perspective would be that disregarding the human cost of profits when human suffering necessarily is concomitant to so profiting, is evil. Hannah Arendt coined the term 'the banality of evil' when discussing bureaucrats just following orders to quantify concentration camp internees, and associated processes, failing to take responsibility for how their work translated into suffering of the internees in WWII.

"...which is why billions are spent in propaganda to prevent just that."

Indeed.

Thanks!

Edit: rereading your comment I had additional thoughts.

"If being "good" was profitable they would all do it."

In fact, my understanding of the present evolution of tech is that across all fields of industry today decentralization of the means of production is the cutting edge of tech advance, mandated by the laws of physics, and causing the decentralized production of necessities and the goods and services creating the blessings of civilization to be more productive than centralized production. This then would create an incentive to support development and dispersal of such decentralized means of production because doing so would increase the productivity of civil society in the creation of prosperity across the board, while reducing the concentration of wealth in the current oligarchy parasitizing the lion's share of wealth from centralized production.

This increase in the prosperity of the general population would only temporarily decrease the wealth of the oligarchy, shown by the wealth of even the poor in Western polities today being far beyond that enjoyed by kings and captains of industry only a few decades ago, prior to the electrical grid and attendant industrial development.

Only the weak principle of 'Cash is king' would seem to mitigate against facilitating the development and dispersal of decentralized means of production in a morally neutral actor, while a rational extrapolation of a rising tide of productivity and the benefits of acquaponics alone (that eliminates the need for cropland, monocropping, all the chemical pollution attendant to centralized commercial agriculture through fertilizers, biocides, and preservatives, and the attendant habitat destruction caused by converting natural ecosystems into cropland) would completely surpass the financial benefits of sustaining centralization to extant oligarchs.

This suggests that retaining control and demociding human populations is preferable to oligarchs for other reasons, such as psychopathic enjoyment of power, causing suffering to 'lesser' persons, and etc.