I noticed something about Covid19 that answers some of these questions. There is proof that they've been working on the plandemic for years. There are manifests showing shipments of Covid19 test kits way back in 2018, and claims by jab manufacturers that they just happened to be working to create this exact thing when it popped up. Also, Pfizer has been testing the lipid nanoparticles at least since 2012, because research they published then showed LNPs concentrated in ovaries. Additionally, there are samples that show SARS2 virus in French sewage from June, 2019, in Italy in August 2019, and a post on 4chan that claimed a new coronavirus was in the wild there in October 2019.

So they had a variety of industries and networks that were using the name Covid19 long before Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli working at the WIV (Wuhan Institute of Virology) managed to get all the necessary parts into a virus and release it. Virology has it's own naming convention, and the virus that eventually fit the bill was the SARS-CoV-2 virus, so named because of it's familial relationships with the Betacoronaviruses, and specifically one that caused SARS.

Most diseases are named the same as the pathogen. You get Yellow Fever from Yellow Fever Virus, Zika from Zika virus, Smallpox from Smallpox virus. But they couldn't just rename the pathogen, because that violated the naming convention for viruses, and that would be super obvious. It would be enormously complex and probably cause all manner of snafus to try to rename all the materials, plans, and goods like test kits and vaccines, that had been in the works for years. So they kept the name of the virus, which I simplify to SARS2, and the name of the disease they'd been working on for years.

That's why Covid19 uniquely is not named the same as it's pathogen, unlike SARS, Ebola, Marburg, and so on. Well, I shouldn't say uniquely, because there's at least one other example of this same thing.

AIDS. How coincidental, eh? Fauci at the root of both of them.

Thanks!