It is frustrating to confront folks who do not make the effort to communicate their understanding and neither act in agreement with one's own. It is true that no one has a right to anothers personal thoughts and beliefs, but society cannot function unless we share and discuss them, which enables us to work together towards a common purpose.

While it is sometimes - often - an impassable obstacle to discussion when emotions color statements, it is unavoidable that people experiencing harm become emotionally aroused by it. It is very obvious that Machiavellian manipulators abuse this fact when we observe protests and screeching chants are used to prevent discussion. Such protests are used to prevent resolving issues or reforming policies. When we see the police placing pallets of bricks where protests will be the following day we understand such protests are actually used to prevent political reform and to enforce the policies of the Machiavellian corruptors of the state. We can observe that the Biden administration states polices that agree with BLM, that the enemedia supports the violent riots that destroyed businesses and homes of the protesting class, and city councils, as has San Francisco recently, defund police, DA's decline to prosecute violent criminals, and pass ordinances that make it illegal to defend property against theft and vandalism. Those riots and crimes are then the visible policy of the WEF that has corrupted local and national governments, and it is then able to be understood that the purpose of the WEF and BlackRock is to destroy the extant political system, because that is necessary before a new political system can be instituted.

You have to tear down your old house before you can build a new one.

When such protestors serving such masters are engaged in debate by people that do not intend to permit their society to be replaced by a NWO, such debate is prevented, either by screeching and chanting on the part of demonstrators, or by the tactic in the OP, which extends to the Delphi technique in public meetings, where such discussion is shut down with statements that there will be discussion at another time or venue, or simply not responded to at all.

While we do not have a right to demand private persons discuss their personal beliefs, we certainly do have the right, and the duty, to demand public officials not only discuss their policies, but enforce the policies we charge them with carrying out. This is why corruption is undertaken in secret, why overlords aren't actually the government administrators with the official responsibility to administer policy, because good government and policies that serve the population are being prevented and replaced with tyranny that serves overlords.

As we approach the tipping point at which we will be compelled to tear down corrupted institutions that are opposing their purpose due to their corruption, we should prefer to tear out of society Machiavellian manipulators that are corrupting government instead, because once they are no longer corrupting government policies that serve the population will once again be implemented by honest administrators of the institutions we create for that purpose. The problem is that few of us know this, and all of us know government is failing, so what happens instead is that corrupt government is destroyed and a power vacuum allows the NWO to take it's place.

Great effort is expended to keep the identities of the Machiavellian manipulators corrupting government secret, and politicians are fall guys for their policies instead. When the overlords go too far and the population hangs the fall guys, the actual overlords remain to corrupt whoever we replace the hanged traitors with. We see that no mechanism is in place to transform the wealth and power of overlords with socially functional administration, because it has inevitably been gained through criminal fraud, and only criminal purposes underlie it. Welfare for widows and orphans can't replace a mafia, because the mafioso and the mob infrastructure are incapable of serving that purpose. They are only suitable for committing crimes and cannot be transformed into nuns and orphanages.

We see numerous examples of societies that have collapsed when such Machiavellian overlords have been toppled, because no means of continuing government was able to be contrived from the criminal infrastructure that had arisen over time in such societies. In Central America we see at the end of the Mayan period those elite neighborhoods were selectively burned, and we can also find similar collapses in Mesopotamia and across the Old World, and in almost all cases civilization itself collapsed because such infrastructure could not be adapted to provide nominal just governance and no longer provided corrupt government either.

For this reason I continually advocate not revolution, but evolution. We need just governance and decentralization of wealth and power to evolve as we each ourselves create wealth and power we can use to support civil society over time. In the event that corruption is eliminated through violent revolution, such infrastructure of civil society we produce isn't eliminated then, and can continue to provide necessary governance that enables civil society to continue, and prevent the collapse of civilization. We cannot serve corporate masters and provide such roles. When the corruption is ended, our corporate masters are ended, and we have no means of replacing the governance, however terrible, they provided if we only worked for them, and did not ourselves provide such services.

We must work for ourselves, and not for overlords, if we are to create just and functional civil society. That way when the corrupt are hanged, we still maintain civil society, because we ourselves are the sources of wealth and power that produce it.

Thanks!