I think communities will sort a lot of this out But I agree null posts should have a marker on them, at least the 100% ones

I think there should be an opportunity for fans to say "thank you" to the opponent for showing up. Well some of them do get paid like $30m a year so maybe that's all the thank you they need.

Shh, don't tell people They might catch on to the fact that I'm actually a secret bid bot

And when you feel like you've had your share of relaxation, come have a conversation with transisto to balance things out

You can't force stakeholders to personally cast each vote at the individual level. But we would much prefer it if their stake is used for honest voting rather than vote selling. And that's exactly what

Best thing about steem is that when you start enumerating your paragraphs It usually fucks you around a bit and you somehow end up with another 1. again no matter what you type hehe Anyway congrats on

haha that's awesome The little one has no horns :p

OCDB just switched over to full curation which is really big Bernie recently went white hat too Hopefully we're gaining ground and can make honest voting the dominant form of behavior on here

The entire curation experience will always rely on one's subjective opinion. If it's at least honest, I'm happy. I don't think the problem of bad taste is anywhere near as bad as content indifferent voting.

Convergent linear should be very close to a 50-60% tax at the lowest end From the graphs, it was like -40% value right at the start, and +20% at the peak I don't know if detecting low level profitable

I'm somewhat indifferent to the reverse auction timer being shorter. Maybe a case could be made for it being longer, but there are trade offs here, though nothing seriously major either way. Convergent

Forcing all profitable behavior into the light is just the curve making it difficult for exploiters to hide their farming or circle jerking activities in micro voted comments and avoid scrutiny and possible

Curation is better than vote selling. Manual curation is (arguably) better than auto vote sniping, at least for the health of the platform. High concentration of stake based voting in the hands of a few

Heh if the difference between honest curation and profit maximization curation is 10% vs 18%, it's already shrunk considerably from pre EIP where honest curation was making maybe 1/4 that of vote selling

Upvoted and SPS voted

While convergent curve has the negative side effect of hurting lower payout posts, it's necessary for the intended consequence of bringing all profitable behavior into light. If you attempt to circumvent

Congratulations OCD, really applaud the move to curation! I hope other vote selling networks make this pivot as well. Vote selling inherently undermines the process of honest voting and defeats our proof

Give me a high level quick explanation with how it works first Circumventing the rewards curve is precisely something we don't want people to be doing. Every post goes through that dull period at the start

Ahh fair enough Even if it's just an inclination or slight partiality to certain topics, it'll still help

I am. Right now. I'm open to the possibility that I'm wrong and that it's not, at least in part, an elaborate vote selling/vote trading scheme. Whenever you're handing out votes for reasons other than