No, not when - what? What did you do to get on the list?

What did you do to get on it?

What’s the issue?

You sent me a memo asking how to retract a delegation back. If you do a "new" delegation of zero SP, that will retract the delegation. The SP voting power will return after the "cool off"

Would you try to help people (after checking if you agree with their matter) - for example by upvoting them There is a large group of people in the community who do do this, and I would say that after

If I flag you once, indeed, I am under no obligation to justify that, but if I automatically flag every of your comments and posts, until you leave STEEM, then I think I should have a good reason for doing

Steem is a decentralized self governing system. Other people are going to act in ways that differ from your personal value system of what is right and wrong, and they are allowed to do so provided the

I go back to they are allowed to use their stake for whatever they want. You can try to talk to them and convince them to do otherwise, but they are under no obligation to do what you say.

you can talk to the steem cleaners group here:

users/accounts are allowed to upvote/downvote for whatever reason they want. You can discuss with them in their steem.chat channel if you want: #steemitabuse.

Steem != steemit.com

That is fair, and I definitely agree with the idea of emphasizing the fact that users are stakeholders. At the time the post was written though, the community was already quite polarized over the hardfork

You can frame it however you want. At the end of the day, there are very few (if any) minnows on the platform right now earning enough rewards to make it worth their time to contribute. You can fight to

too many people into the idea of being able to downvote stuff are not paying attention to how strongly it offends the downvoted person. Sorry, but users need to get accustom to the fact that there are

I have not forgotten. I want more large stakeholders to curate content, which means voting on more content from minnows. I am voting based on my subjective opinion of what I feel is right for the platform.

I don't know. Whether you/we like it or not, Steem is a stake based system. The largest stakeholders are going to have the most influence over what gets rewarded. Historically we have not done a good job

There are definitely niche groups here that are doing well. I didn't mean to imply that nobody sticks around.

It is fairly subjective.

The problem with this discussion is that it assumes no changes in behavior among the voters. If there is no change in behavior, then things will be worse for users who are not earning much. The whole point

The number was calculated by running the current voting data though the new rewards curve and comparing the results. The problem with this discussion is that it assumes no changes in behavior among the