Outside of principle, if I did believe in punitive action against people on HIVE based who they voted for on Steem, then I would agree with you. In addition to that, the proxy voters. Some of them may

Thanks for explaining OP for me. I don't think that Sun or his socks should get it, seeing as how they were the malicious actors. However, a fine balance needs to be maintained to lower the amount of

Hmm, I'm not sure what OPs is. After going through the logic of the idea that it might be an entitlement, gift, or a relief package — if those are poor examples of defining the airdrop, are there any other

Hmm, okay, so if we go with relief package. Let's assume a natural disaster hit the blockchain because dPoS and decentralization cannot play nice together. The natural disaster was the chain split. Not

"The hypotetichal Hillary Clinton analogy that you are using is a very bad one because not everyone is entitled to receive the relief package...so even that has conditions." In the comment above

Are the 300 Disenfranchised HIVE Accounts Entitled to the Airdrop?

I agree, razorwave8, and that's a great analogy. The sanctity of every individual's vote when you're electing leaders into governance is extremely important. When it gets undermined, it corrupts the entire

Over the years, I've been a fan of at least three doctor tv shows. They make even the residents look like stable geniuses in comparison to what this woman has described in her account. I'm inclined to

I gather from this that you're against dPoS entirely, and that's a perfectly valid idea. The only problem with it is that the system is set up in such a way to incentivize people to buy the token. People

I think the only problem with choosing a fixed position. All dPoS or all decentralization, is that it breaks the thing. I'd have to put some more thought into it. If we disregard the stake entirely, it's

Voted for Hive Secondary Airdrop: For Individual Voters. Hive Secondary Airdrop: For Proxied Voters. This is why... The 300 individuals excluded from the airdrop voted for a witness or a proxy. This action

Should be interesting to see how it all shakes out. In part, it seems a bit like a distraction from what's going on in the real world.

Well the metrics they used weren't coded to exclude stake based on ethnicity afaik.

Nope, but I'll check into it! Thanks for the info.

Why do you think that our current oligarchy changing policies to allow more censorship might be likely going forward? Is it because of the blockchain war, or people dual posting to both chains and those

I agree, a Yes Airdrop vs. No Airdrop would have at least been an honest effort to solve the problem.

My Critique on HIVEio's Second Airdrop "Proposal."

My Critique on HIVEio's Second Airdrop "Proposal."

My Critique on HIVEio's Second Airdrop "Proposal."

My Critique on HIVEio's Second Airdrop "Proposal."