"It's just fair that our community has a right to exclude certain people from an airdrop" Is it fair for a government to exclude citizens from government benefits if they vote for the wrong political

"As you point out the fervor of discussion after the sale to Tron caused you to give the matter thought, and to vote accordingly." I may not have been clear, I investigated who they were voting

Almost missed this, thanks for your reply @king.bee. I've addressed your query about quislings in this other thread.

I got hive cuz I managed to take part of the airdrop, which wasnt hard.actually I had to do exactly nothing. :) That's interesting. It looks like you and I are in the same boat, that's exactly how I got

"Still noone has a right to any new token or coin." Can I ask you why you got HIVE, did you have a right, or did you get HIVE because you voted "correctly?" Was the vote a vote, or

There are three categories of HIVEians excluded from the airdrop based on how they voted on the other blockchain. (14) Steemit accounts, (18) Tron sock puppet accounts, and (300) accounts of other HIVEian's

Great video, thank you!

Lot's of politically interesting statements in the above post, many of which I agree with. I think you kind of glossed over the fact that the result would be the same with dhimmel's solution, however we

Hey @luegenbaron, thx for commenting! Those 300 HIVEians, in particular, are they less equal, or should they get fewer rights because of who they voted for as a witness (or proxy) on a completely different

Did we prevent a communist takeover of Steem? As far as I know, "the commies" have that now, and in doing so they made us look rather foolish. They made us infringe upon the dPoS of the largest

If we ever get to the point where dissenting opinions of regular stakeholders are not penalized, I would be in favor of an idea similar to yours where witness votes expire after an allotted amount of time.

I've got to say that's a very interesting and thoughtful comment, @king.bee. Bear in mind that people can vote for candidates and proxies based on more than just a singular issue. A lot of people, myself

Aside from the effort that I put into this post, it's relatively effortless for any HIVEian to not vote for witnesses until they correct the mistake. With regards to the meaningful endeavor portion, that's

If moral absolutism could be compared to theism and moral relativism to atheism, then I'm agnostic. I realize, those are big ifs.

They don't call it the trolley problem for nothing. If you send the trolley down path (A) to save the people in path (B) are you responsible for killing the people in (A)? How can one decide or not decide

: -)

Thanks for sharing the link!

Nice, yeah sometimes I like to crank up the speed on podcasts too!

I found some further information outside of the study with eight participants that suggest ace-2 is involved. "If we think of the human body as a house and 2019-nCoV [another name for SARS-CoV-2]

Good question.