I guess we shall see what it do, but if a random sneeze or rub of the eyes or touch of the face can give ya HIV. It's just stupid, we'll have to cure HIV.

Even outside of the possibility that ACE2 may or may not be race specific. If you catch the HIV flu and you're shedding HIV. Basically, everyone will be shedding HIV. Everyone will get the HIV regardless

I wasn't aware the one study with only eight participants was the only ace2 study. For some reason I was under the impression this factor was common knowledge. I think both Boyle and Adams were talking

Exactly..... a choice is not a choice, in and of itself! The Harvard lecture is edifying though, even beyond the trolley problem there is much to learn.

You've got your scorched earth policy, now we simply need to see how the potential investors view the chain. Markets will reveal the true-true.

My one question if this is flying flocking HIV? Isn't preventing infection just delaying the inevitable? All the people not getting the HIV because of isolation. Will eventually get the HIV because everyone

So if you go on a Safari because you're an animal lover, and the tour guide is attacked by one lion in a pack of lions. Do you shoot that lion with his rifle or not? Mind you, if you don't, what will end

Can't argue that, also since the community divide will likely result in two blockchains. This means, you don't have to collect the airdrop on the sisterchain. You can just use the tron/steem chain if ya

Decentralization and dPoS do seem to conflict with one another. I can see why you're frustrated by this. People believe both can exist, but eventually they can clash. JS doing with his dPoS breaks

The forks suggested are an entirely new chain. A new token which is airdropped. People don't seem to have faith in his governance. If he creates a divide that forces a split, then his ninjamine coin will

I don't subscribe to just one, I think both exist, and both have their place. I can go on a Safari with a long arm & shoot a Lion just because I can do it. Or I can go on a Safari with a long arm &

Oh, I'm not saying your comment is correct or incorrect just that I didn't say it. TBH the whole situation is muddy and can be viewed from many different angles. In the strictly technical sense the new

Nah, it's fine. I just wanted to clarify that I was not calling the community organized criminals. I can see both sides of this debate, and it's very unfortunate that it went down the way it did. I think

I believe both, but the latter isn't necessarily right or just, it's simply evidence that the law of the jungle reigns supreme behind the illusion of bc/morality. I think reputations may have been tarnished

I appreciate the mentions and all, but I'd like to point out I did not say "the community." I do see the multiple ways to view this community vs. Justin Sun thing. If they felt they had to exclude

It sounds like the community precipitated one. So, I guess we shall see what it do and how well it is received by the marketplace.

Thanks, @oyddodat. Hopefully, it's not as awful as it appears.

Well said, click here for information on the basic reproduction number.

Getting the R-naught to below 1 absent mass preparedness on an airborne virus seems impossible to me without triggering some kind of mass starvation, looting, and your run of the mill zombie apocalypse