I have significant legal concerns regarding the DAO proposal that passed, mentioned in this proposal, regarding an exchange listing.
When the DAO hired Clayboyn, it was to become an organizer and voice for the DAO, because legally speaking, Clayboyn could not become part of the DAO or an extension of the DAO.
The reason for this, is that if Clayboyn starts to act on behalf of the DAO in ways that a DAO does not operate, such as negotiate on behalf of the DAO and pursuing the execution of deals, with the DAO's money, that are not recorded on the blockchain in a trustless way and/or not disclosed to the DAO because of NDA's,the DAO is no longer a Decentralized Autonomous Organization, and both Clayboyn and the DAO funds can become the target of the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission) and/or the target of civil lawsuits brought by individual SPS token holders.
As one of the first functioning gaming DAO's we should take great care and responsibility of not putting our DAO, and anyone who organizes on it's behalf, in significant legal jeopardy.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Expand Market Making Contract with Flowdesk