How did the very "overlords" you condemn for the miseries of the 20th century attain their power? Is it not through the revolt of the peasant muck against their betters, led by those malicious

All the miseries of this world are caused by reformers, such as yourself, who imagine themselves more "enlightened" than the collective wisdom of human history. Will you next redefine and reform

Continents are categorised as such for convenience. It may be arbitrary, but human society can not function without definitions and categorisations. There is no evil conspiracy to control children, merely

How convenient for you to begin the failed state narratives from the middle, as if the failure/decline of central authority and its subversion by the revolutionary elements had nothing to do with the rise

The so-called "trade" war benefits all parties involved. The US Senate resolution is no accident or quirk of the moment decision. The international tension and hostility is predetermined and

"Freedom" is nothing more than whim repackaged in pretty sounding abstraction. Western freedom, in which every whim is catered and considered as divine law, results in chaos and death. The muck

"Freedom" is merely a rhetorical slogan to mobilise unwise youths and the gullible into destabilising current sociopolitical status for the benefit of the ambitious. The so-called protests in

Everything that is given you were your inherent rights and being, while anything that you were allowed to possess are your by your own "efforts." What narcissism the tenets of humanist freedom

I have no gods. All I am and have I have attained myself, without any grant from any peer. So, you forged these barbaric lands into some semblence of order, established measure and standards, wrote legal

All of the colonial conspirators very existence was derived from previleges granted by his Majesty's government, against which the discontented muck rebelled. What treasure or blood did your gods possess

Yes. A discontented colonial confederacy, breft of any sense of decorum, loyalty, or gratitude, where the basest of men delude themselves into imagining themselves claygods, dictating to Heaven his mean

What he is contending is that the only rights a man possesses is that which he can forcibly wrest from the clutches of another. Everything else is cock and bull.

"Freedom" and "individuality" are meaningless concepts, when used in pure abstraction. Freedom from what? Freedom to do what? Individuality in what context? These qualifiers are not

"Civil" rights are entirely unnecessary, if the governing polity enforces existing legal statutes guaranteeing enumerated privileges. In 'Murica, "civil" right, as a concept, is merely

It is the very "freedom" that put these clowns into positions unworthy of their incompetence and pettiness. What other results would any thinking men expect from a sociopolitical system built

It's not about country, it's about protecting the elites. What is a "country," a "nation," or a "state" that men are willing to kill other men and inflict destruction upon

I guess if a person actually believes all the paranoid conspiracy nonsense that spam the various social media platforms and has been stockpiling survival gear for the better part of their lives, any and

As with any new technology, usually the fringe groups are the first to embrace innovation. The fringe of modern society exist outside usual regulatory infrastructure, and likely continue to wish such

A mob of rioters vandalise and terrorise Hong Kong, threatening violence to law enforcement officers, but it is the police who must attempt conversation over tea, begging the thugs to desist in their

As the Senior Superintendent stated, the video does not show any clear evidence of officers kicking a suspect. The video is not focused. Just because the video maker shouted prejudiced opinions does not