smooth's comments - older posts | Ecency

DiscoverWavesCommunities

smooth

@smooth

73

Resource Credits

Available

Used

Created

2016-03-25 13:36

RSS Feed

Comments

Blog Posts Comments Communities Wallet

smooth

7y

RE: [Proposal] Improvents to the proposal system

Another small improvement we could use is to put the proposal id in the account history entry for payouts. Currently it isn't there.

$ 0.000

0

smooth

7y

RE: OCDB and Downvotes | A #NewSteem approach

The one identified in the post is making large enough payout to benefit from the curve rather than be hurt by it. Which is part of why we even know about it, because such large payouts make it more obvious.

$ 0.048

2

smooth

7y

RE: OCDB and Downvotes | A #NewSteem approach

I agree with you but the emphasis in the discussion on 'voting circles' tends to, perhaps more than intended, and almost certainly more than is ideal, put the focus on who is voting, who is receiving votes,

smooth

7y

RE: The Hitchhiker's Guide To SteemPeak Proposals

Re. #5 My suggestion is to state a minimum required funding for the work to be done and if you get less than that, send it back to SPS.

smooth

7y

RE: OCDB and Downvotes | A #NewSteem approach

Yeah I understand what you are saying about downvotes being used as a malicious competitive tool and I'm certainly not in favor of that. Anyway thanks for taking the initiative on this now as you have

smooth

7y

RE: OCDB and Downvotes | A #NewSteem approach

considering the fork was only 4 or so days ago Yup. What really matters is how this all plays out over the next several months. The early changes are exciting but that's also a bit of a trap because once

smooth

7y

RE: OCDB and Downvotes | A #NewSteem approach

Dare I say it almost seems difficult to find posts to downvote right now, Yeah, you're right about this. There is definitely a lot of value in looking for the more hidden abuses right now. I just don't

smooth

7y

RE: OCDB and Downvotes | A #NewSteem approach

It would be irresponsible from our side and it would represent a conflict of interest if a stake distribution service downvotes posts that received bidbot votes... and since most of the posts trending

smooth

7y

RE: [Proposal] Improvents to the proposal system

I would be against this currently as the Bitshares system (upon which SPS is based) has a track record of working fine using the return (or burn) mechanism. Introducing structural changes to a complicated

smooth

7y

RE: [Proposal] Improvents to the proposal system

Please address vote totals for inactive (upcoming) proposals. This is needed for stakeholders to know how to vote but the only way to calculate it currently is to retrieve all votes and add them up. This

smooth

7y

RE: Support Steem.DAO: Return Proposal

As currently implemented it is only yes or no (true or false in the api). All sorts of improvement proposals are possible but I think changing the true-or-false boolean to a percentage gets us most of

smooth

7y

RE: Reduced Inflation Proposal

Another way to do this would be to have multiple smaller proposals (say 100 SBD each, or perhaps an assortment of sizes like physical coins: 100,100,100,100,500,etc.). As many as desired could be voted

smooth

7y

RE: EpicDice is compromised

Okay, but no need to buy votes to reward yourself for your incompetence. Downvoted.

smooth

7y

RE: Reduced Inflation Proposal

I think a better proposal would mirror @burnpost in trading the SBD for STEEM if the price of SBD is $1+, and burning the resulting STEEM, and either burning or converting (via blockchain convert function)

smooth

7y

RE: Representing STEEM At The “Bitcoin is_” Conference in L.A. This Weekend - My Goals

The recent blockchain update introduced the ability to submit proposals of work for payment. There isn't a UI to see this on steemit.com yet but you can see it here:

smooth

7y

RE: Delegation Issue

The rest of your comment is old news, and we don't even disagree that a lot of the reward payouts have been captured by large stakeholders. We disagree on what HF21 is attempting to do (IMO it is specifically

smooth

7y

RE: Delegation Issue

I'm dismissing inactive accounts from being so much of the witness voting pool so as to overwhelm active users' votes, which it certainly isn't. Active users add value regardless of stake, so there is

smooth

7y

RE: Delegation Issue

With a very few exceptions (I can think of one anonymous early adopter with a pretty big account that suddenly disappeared and no one ever heard from; we suspect he or she may have died) the abandoned

smooth

7y

RE: Delegation Issue

I am a stakeholder, and note that I don't care if my stake increases in value Extreme edge cases don't matter. The vast majority (particularly when stake weighted) does care, and even if it weren't a majority,

smooth

7y

RE: Delegation Issue

Case by case is the reality, no matter what people say.

← Latest Older →