Irrelevant how they see things. The metaphor was more along the lines of comparing things like you see depicted in movies, there is a "rich idiot" stereotype and a "poor genius" underdog, usually a nerd, or a poorer person, or something and yet, they are the one with the better plan, the better idea.

It plays out in the movies that the underdog usually wins, but in real life, it tends to play out that the richer but maybe less useful one wins. Not always, but a lot of the time.

So how they see things, is less relevant to me than how passionately they CARE about things that make this a useful place in some fashion or other for everyone, Whether I agree with them or not. Not for just a few wealthy enough to make it their little toy to get money from the pool, regardless of the impact on others.

In this context though, the goal is to care about the health, success and future life of this blockchain, so I'd be rooting for the underdog with vote for the brilliant code suggestion or marketing idea to grow it all for everyone, over the rich one who votes to make sure his own personal cash gets cashier at the expense of the future of the thing's growth and acceptance as a viable place for everyone else.