The median of the value generated by Hive users is already probably a lot more than $10 per year. We don't have too many passive users who occasionally drop by just to put in some likes. Almost everyone

Thanks for mentioning $SXP. I'll look into it.

As a crypto investor I've learned to be passive. I only try to time my buys in the accumulation phase and my sells to match the distribution phase. In Bitcoin's case, both phases occur only once every

At some point, there will have to be a disconnect because crypto is not dependent upon money from the Fed. What that would require is a market for goods and services to emerge where crypto is used as a

That is, if banks are going to start providing cryptocurrency trading and custody services to their customers.

Marginally. They have KYC for addresses from which funds are sent to exchanges in the Netherlands. A screenshot will do. You basically just declare that so and so address is controlled by you. To get into

And we know what he will have for dinner one of these days. lol

The new French rules apply to Virtual Asset Providers and exchanges offering crypt-crypto transactions under French jurisdiction. The rules do not criminalize the usage of non-KYC'd exchanges by residents

No one predicted that BTC was going to hit $300k before the winter of 2021/2022.

Good luck banning-crypto backed stablecoins like DAI. There's no way they will be able to do it.

This is why a platform like Hive is pure gold. The Nigerians and the Indians are present on Hive in large numbers. Through them the rest of us get to keep our finger on the pulse as to what's happening

Doing KYC on a single address will do nothing.

The cool part about all this is Michael, along with other Smart Money doesn't know any more than we do. The cooler part is that some of us got in before the Smart Money started buying Bitcoin. The coolest

It depends on how confident you want to be in your estimate. You can play with the numbers here, for example:

The exact same sample size that would be appropriate for 20 million plus or 2 million plus accounts or 20,000 plus accounts. It's the sample size itself that matters and the degree to which the sample

I'm guessing the sampling had some systematic error or it was simply too small.

This doesn't have to have anything to do with Justin Sun. Starting from late November 2017, SBD started a mad run that peaked at $14 very shortly after that and the coin remained clearly above $1 until

No, you don't need a certain percentage of the user base. You only need a random sample of a certain absolute size to get the margin of error within a certain limit.

Only the absolute size of the sample matters, not how large it is relative to the universe of which it is a sample. Anyway, even if there was no systematic bias in the sample, 360 is a small sample size.

Makes sense.