Cool. Thanks for that clarification. I appreciate it and will look into it some more.

Let me start by saying, I know very little about this club, but this quote stood out to me: “Investments are funded through extracting value out of STEEM POWER and taking advantage of STEEM's high inflation

And storing it in your cabin?

This is a great question! All of the votes from here on out (assuming the hf has no problems) will be under HF21 rules. If I understand it correctly, it will be difficult for actifit to continue voting

Woooooo. Spoilers!!!

I think that is called “Hivemind” 😁

I bet a friend it was impossible to blow yourself. One thing led to another and ... yada yada yada ... @jerrybanfield cost me $100 bucks after we found Steemit. Haha I actually came here following Greg

I see many people seem upset by these changes, which I understand. I have not had enough time to digest it one way or another, but I will say this. The actifit team has proven they can move quickly and

This has @exyle written all over it.

It would still be interesting to normal bloggers but the valuation needs to come from somewhere. That is where people behind the scenes come into play. The normal bloggers don’t need to think about that.

Most SMTs will likely be worthless (or should be) just like crypto alts but hopefully some are able to come up with a good business model to make them actually worth something. Maybe through ad revenue

The more I think about this the more I like it. While I am sure some problems are created, removing the Steem reward pool and moving toward individual communities/SMTs addresses the following issues that

I don’t have the details worked out but making sure witnesses are paid to secure the blockchain is obviously required and the inflation rate chosen would make sure that is the case. “Locking” the current

I agree at the moment but could be convinced otherwise. Any major change has unforeseen consequences but something along these lines seems necessary to me.

I agree with you. My worry is getting those millions of users in our current environment of falling prices. I understand a lot of crypto is in a bear market so maybe it will turn around with time. Communities

content creators would get paid with SMTs, such as palnet, where that community is able to best judge the value of their own content. Spambots would be reset in many ways because Steem would only be good

Steem will still need to be distributed because of the requirement of RCs to use the blockchain. How it gets distributed will need to change though. Honestly, the current method of distribution isn’t the

You are correct that bitcoin’s price suffered for a long time but it suffered during a time where it had no competitors. Today, competitors are forming everyday and companies/apps/developers are currently

It might be too early but I just wanted to see some discussion on it to get that ball possibly rolling. I have heard the EIP has been in discussion for at least a year.