It's actually even worse than Larken thinks. Of course it's true that all governments are truly just branches of the same enrforcement arm for those in power, and that the only war ever has been those in power versus the proles, who represent the only threat to that power. But as George Webb describes, these government attacks on the proles are simply a way to focus the survivors on a "better life" under a much stronger tyrannical grip.

For example, Webb justifies the actions pf the Israeli branch of the enforcement arm versus the Palestinians by saying that the Palestinians were living in an apartheid state under a terrorist group, and Israel is destroying those terrorists so that the Palestinians may move to Neom, where life in "fifteen minute cities" and working to build an oil pipeline for the Israel, Saudi and other arms of those in power, will provide the Palestinians with a peaceful life under constant surveillance in a foreign land wihch they also may never leave. And it only took the deaths of a few hundred thousand to "encourage" the Palestinians to move.

Similarly, Webb justifies the attacks on Syria, Lebanon and Iran, by claiming that the Israelis are helping those prole populations by "removing terrorist rulers" and replacing them with "kind dictators". In Iran, that means bring back the Shah. But isn't that better than living in fear of military attack from Israel every day?

Thus Webb posits a new reasons for government violence against the proles - to get them to beg for tyrannical, dictatorial control of their lives rather than being bombed into oblivion. Webb feels this is a noble cause for the Israeli arm of the government and since we all know that the rest of the world is simply an experimental lab for what eventually will come to the USA, we can expect governmental violence in the western hemisphere soon, which will have the noble cause of forcing the proles into deeper surveillance, less mobility and of course loss of even more freedoms than are already lost. But, according to Webb, that's a good thing. Like the WEF, he believes that "we'll all be happier in the long run".