I think you are not understand the token mechanic that is supposed to work behind the downvotes. Upvotes means someone thinks you should be earning more, downvotes means someone thinks you should be earning

Similar to the other proposals, I'd like to know exactly where this money goes. 200$ per day = 6000$ per month. How many developers/designers are hired to work how many hours per week on this for that

Sorry, my terminology was equally confusing. I meant delegating to pools not accounts. Like to a bunch of different communities for example.

It's because I'm wondering if a max count is the best solution or a min size is a better solution. A big account (1 million HP) might want to lend to 100 accounts. This account would have its HP into three

Is there a particular reason for the quantity parameter to be 40? What not 50, what not 25? (Kinda seems like an odd number to me)

Marky or Marty? What is your preferred pronoun?

Hi =D Welcome on the other side

I think in general, any maximalist believes they have the universal truth (that doesn't exist) and closes their eyes for possibly better alternatives. That's the truth for anything in live (politics, religion,

Question: Would you be willing to decline voting rights as a signal of good faith on the Hive blockchain?

Yes, for this short time frame it's incredible already. I plan on doing those more regularly now to check that out.

They are specific smart contracts, but this project needs different ones. "More generic"

They are requiring native smart contracts for those, so they're using Ethereum

Storing certificates on blockchain is a pretty big thing. There are numerous papers already working around that. Having independent organs certify certain things as entities on the blockchain. A group

True, you could pack some more data in the json too to render it on some kind of website too. Would work either way. If you posted it in your own community without any votes I believe no one would flag

Thank god Gina is on hive to notify me about these things. Shouldn't be too hard. I mean you might even want to make it an actual post on the blockchain where the certificate is nicely formatted

There will be votes btw for the remaining airdrops.

Those will be group appeals. Those are made by the community and then approved by the community. It's not submissive at all.

That's why the community can vote on airdropping those people after all. From a technical point of view it is the right thing to do. PoS needs accountability

Splitting up stake how? If 50% of the stake is liquid, 25% is short term staked and 25% is long term staked. That's less stake then voting for governance. Well, they aren't really investors themselves,

I did ready your post fully, but it seems you did not read my comment fully. Either way you do it, it is bad for governance. The only reasonable thing is: The same powerdown time for all operations (To