You can trade them perfectly on chain. What's the problem? Make your own market for now.

If they read this, a basic tier video could offer: 1 video upload per week, max quality of 720 (no 1020) and be stored max 1 year (unless upgraded to premium later on). This would be pretty cheap for them

To all users or to the top 30 users?

To the other points. I also don't see much merit in the business model. There should be a free basic tier with certain limits and upvotes should be distributed to manually curated top content.

Might be interesting to get a bit left leaning content on 3Speak though. Right now it seems strongly like another right wing echo chamber.

That's the only way to establish a long-term stable token economy. And that's what we should be interested at.

Would be nice to have a button to go through blocks (like a left and right arrow to switch blocks)

I'd say its a mix between Technology, Community and Accessibility. Steem excels on accessibility (it is exceptionally easy to develop application on top of Steem) has a decently large actual user base

It's probably some statistical thing they do "Likelihood depending on device and IP"

Nowadays I get similar messages from a couple of different sites. All probably common DDoS targets. The bigger sites (Google and Facebook etc) probably have their own homemade solutions for these kind

Haha, yeah. But that would reduce the coverage further and make the system more fragile.

I'm currently doing an analysis of the system, might make a post out of it next week. One of the main issues really is that many many stakeholders are not voting at all. While many big stakeholders have

Hadn't seen your answer at all. Yeah the idea was a small budget fix, especially since there are "more urgent" matters to attend in the mid term. In the long term those things have to be fixed

Yeah, those two care the least. Those will suffer the most with the new EIP =D

Which vote sellers?

Sometimes calling out those bots which don't flag him works wonders =D

Interestingly he has the same opinion as I have in terms of the centralization of all the mentioned solutions. (PoW, PoS and DPoS). Although the level on which he suggests to fix it is much more complex

I don't think there has ever been a real proof, and I vaguely recall some reasonable argument it was actually 33%. But I may be misremembering or wrong. In the literature they generally accept 51% for

Yeah, practically a good max threshold you'd want to allow would be either the classical n=3f+1, allowing each stakeholder to elect max f replicas (Where we got our max n given by 20). But that usually

That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. It becomes easier to elect a smaller amount of witnesses for 1 large stakeholder. The less votes we have, the easier it should become to select a small number but