However if there are multiple factors it would appear as more chaotic. Maybe you are right. There is also a flaw in the interpretation of CO2 levels. What's wrong with my mathematical interpretation of

Assuming the distance from the sun at perihelion remains fairly constant That assumption is wrong. Due to conversation of energy the perihelion needs to be closer. And because the energy is proportional

I think the old version of emojis(like :) :| :( :D :P ………)are more then enough for adding expressions to your text. Also I don't really like emojis because on most mobile device the capacity of symbols

Could you maybe add a non-android interface? I actually don't want to go through the stress of installing of installing android SDK to eclipse.

In the chart there is usually lagging back because of all those astronomical events that you describe which change the temperature without changing CO₂ which will only slowy solve in the oceans at cooler

About your source: This clearly is no scientific article, so to gather any trustworthy you would need to examine the sources of it. On the article two sources were linked: A wikipedia article about cycles

It seems like you forgot a few things in your collection of flat earth videos. There for example bob knodel who discovered that the earth is spinning using a laser gyroscope: Also there is jeran who send

1

paranoid schizophrenic!

10 and 40

$12.3

It would be funny if you had written the powers in binary, too: 10110 = 1×10¹⁰⁰+0×10¹¹+1×10¹⁰+1×10¹+0*10⁰

No a volcano definitely cannot be caused by precession. Also based on your logic we should see a cooling right now instead of a warming. Also precession is a rather slow process → the temperature change

It hasn't the best graphics, but I kind of like the gameplay in star control 2: :

32

I have some dust → so I choose dustsweeper

SBI

25 STEEM

You say an allknowing god is needed to foresee the future, but wouldn't a big physics simulation be enough to foresee human behaviour? Because as far as I know the quantum indeterminism is negligible on

Do you know about the orbit equation? It might be used together with the second kepler law to create a useful equation. Edit: Just noticed that you are making gravity towards more then one object at once,