I don't vote, but I find the race very interesting.

Trump is so terrible on trade and privacy, but by far the best on foreign policy. Voting for the candidate that you think is least likely to kill millions of people around the globe is an attractive idea. I almost voted for Obama in 08 because McCain was such a scary warhawk. I appreciate Trump the most because of how he has shown the social justice warriors in the media to be nothing but a paper tiger. Also you can almost tell how brainwashed people are by their reaction to him. Its almost like an IQ test.

Hillary is evil, but she knows how to play the game, and unless you were a threat to her and she had to make you disappear, then chances are things wouldn't be that bad.

Cruz is almost as bad domestically as Trump, and far far worse in foreign policy. Since presidents have far greater control of foreign policy than they do over domestic policy, the result of a Cruz presidency would probably be similar to a Clinton presidency. Same old same old.

Bernie Sanders is a different monster altogether. He wants to get money out of politics, by giving away tons of free shit to people that vote for him. The efficacy of his ideas is limited even in small homogeneous countries. They would be a disaster in the US. Once again he would only be able to get so much past congress.

Ultimately I think they are all horrible, and giving any of them power over others enforced by violence is evil. All four of them would happily preside over a state that would murder me if I sufficiently resisted their graft.

I can understand the argument that the slaves will vote for the master that beats them the least, but I won't be taking part. I am reminded of, of all things.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of
acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”

Noam Chomsky

and

"A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years."

Lysander Spooner