Thanks for your reply. I was also confused at first because it's been a while since looking at PsyberX in depth. I said "person working for a person" in the above comment which could get skimmed over easily. I still stand by my point about complicity though. Promoting something that turns out to be a scam, when there is plenty of strong hints that it is, is complicity in that scam. Like anyone promoting ponzis like Bitconnect, etc.

You put PsyberX as "a surface level dream project where Hive is funding a dude's college ambition to create a halo game" very well. It seems clear enough to me that after his failure-to-launch Kickstarter campaign, Justin went looking for a community of suckers with magic internet money to fund him and found Hive. Starting with the LVL token with promises of NFT distribution, and then direct NFT sales. Almost everything is about selling them and while there is some "gameplay" or at least in-engine videos being presented, none of it looks like it's in any state to be released as a game worth playing within any reasonable timeframe.

I had no idea that NFTs on other networks were being sold. That sure doesn't increase my desire to do anything but downvote their posts and call it a value-draining scam for Hive. Even having said that, if a playable game was released and it was still Hive-based I would buy at least $100 worth of their NFTs. I want to be proven wrong about this. But I won't say nothing when there are so many hallmarks of a charlatan that we've all seen before.

Just like this post was an overreaction, my response to Troy's comment that he deleted after he left it was also out of scale, although on a high level I really don't think Hive should be distributing rewards out to a value-sucking scheme, if that's what PsyberX turns out to be. And based on almost a decade in the crypto world, it's reminiscent of schemes I've seen many times before.