I didn't say everyone earns. I didn't say everyone succeeds. That was left out because it's commonsense. The eventual tips pouring in can be observed on other platforms. It happens, often. Streamer example, it's hard to find one where someone isn't being thanked for the tip.

What I'm attempting to point out and often fail is how the support system is the only thing that makes this platform different. It's not used effectively though or even marketed.

Pointing out how it can be used to gather authentic organic support. You're seeing how it's being used now to recycle existing money and the rest of this disaster.

A content creator here could easily use patreon. The supporters then lose out on the benefits of staking and voting. That's the difference. Same action. Better deal for the consumer. And in eight years nobody has tried to get outside support by offering those perks. I'm talking about "natural support" as you put it. And there are plenty of studies pointing to the fact consumers spend more when perks are involved, but that's not the point.

When I explain it, most can't see how consumers/supporters and investors have different mindsets. It often turns into this whole story about how they'd dump for profit. Their goal is to support content, much like they would using patreon or tipping a streamer or youtuber or anything. They're coming for content, not crypto.

This model that already exists without changing anything here can compete with patreon, and win.

I said I just need a few people to understand what I'm talking about. You're not one and explaining this any other way still won't make sense to you. That won't stop me from continuing on trying to find those people that get it. Some do. Most don't. Most are stuck in their comfort zones here or convinced everything is broken and it's a lost cause.

Without outside money coming in to make up for the cost of the content here, all this content amounts to a net loss. That's not attractive to any big miracle investor, unless they came along to build something combined with the same plans I'm trying to highlight here. They'd want to make money.

Our Hive Engine tokenized communities with several contributors and a weekly payout is akin to a weekly issued magazine. In order for someone to purchase that magazine, they stake tokens and vote for articles. The reason all those tokens struggle is because they didn't sell their "magazine" to readers.

Creating a product for consumers, ignoring consumers, and hoping for a big investor to show up is ridiculous. There's a scaled down example of how seeking outside money, embracing supporters and offering those perks that come standard would rejuvenate the entire project. It's very basic business principles I'm pointing out here. Nothing more.