Here is an interesting one. I go past these 2 traffic cameras to and from work every day, so tonight I stopped to take a picture of the one.
But I looked online, and while it is "allowed" by law, it is in fact NOT reportable if you do not pay it.
But I found this article tonight - a guy who is a part of the system, a state lawmaker, burned his:
For more on this lawmaker guy, check his site.
"In 2015, Holt successfully sponsored legislation that bans new contracts for use of the cameras to issue speeding tickets. But that law included a provision allowing contracts in place at the time it took effect — July 1, 2015 — to continue using the cameras. Holt says some cities used that provision to quickly renew their contracts to avoid the ban, in some cases for up to 20 years."
That is how they work when they are threatened with the loss of revenue.
