thanks so much for putting up this new proposal. it sounds very good to me and will have my vote. just a few things:
"permit" sounds beaurocratic and exclusive. maybe the good old "season pass" is better and a more familar term?
players will want to test the wild format to see how competitive their decks are. requiring a payment for this purpose might be concieved as an unaccepptable hurdle by some. instead of excluding non "permit" owners from performing battles it might be better just to exclude them from earning any kind of rewards while still allowing to play?
conditions do change. the proposal text should reflect this. instead of "I propose that the permit will cost 2000 DEC/DEC-B or 40 VOUCHER tokens..." i suggest:"I propose that the permit will cost a certain amount of DEC/DEC-B or VOUCHER tokens starting with 2000 DEC/DEC -B or 40 VOUCHER tokens...".
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Alternate Solution to Address Bot Farms & Wild/Modern Format Discrepancies