LOGICZOMBIE
@logiczombiewelcome to thought club
Resource Credits
Available
Used
$ 0.000
2
RE: Although subjectively downvoting posts to zero is anathema to me, the Layer 1 ability to do so must remain (for now at least)
In the original system, your UPVOTE bar could be used up by UPVOTING (OR) by DOWNVOTING. You could choose to DOWNVOTE but that would reduce your total available UPVOTE. After HF21, a FREE DOWNVOTE bar
RE: Although subjectively downvoting posts to zero is anathema to me, the Layer 1 ability to do so must remain (for now at least)
The reversing/countering initiatives are going to run in circles indefinately. The reason behind it is the difference in the UV architecture vs DV architecture. While I consider "normalising DVs"
RE: Although subjectively downvoting posts to zero is anathema to me, the Layer 1 ability to do so must remain (for now at least)
so to clarify, if u have a big enough wallet, u can be a douche or a king, and people will fall at your feet. and if u are broke af and posting just to put food in your mouth, it doesnt matter how 'smart'
RE: Although subjectively downvoting posts to zero is anathema to me, the Layer 1 ability to do so must remain (for now at least)
The rewards are neither rewards, the punishments neither punishments. No one wants to help anyone succeed, because the individual's personal blog is merely a pass-through for number shifts. All that is
RE: Although subjectively downvoting posts to zero is anathema to me, the Layer 1 ability to do so must remain (for now at least)
Imagine an economy where you had the option to EITHER give performers a tip OR take a tip from a performer. Now imagine that when you take a tip from a performer, they're tip gets "redistributed"