RE: RE: Pay-to-play vs. Proof-of-work -- is this way gone and done with?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Pay-to-play vs. Proof-of-work -- is this way gone and done with?

Words
161
Reading
1 min
2y

It's difficult to say. If investors simply desire ROI, they can purchase HBD and put it in savings and watch it grow effortlessly.

True.

If investors want INFLUENCE, they could purchase a ton of HIVE and power it up and upvote and downvote to their own pleasure.

Also true.

So....for the ROI types, why not just put HBD in a savings account then? Why put up with all the crustaceans in the Hive bucket?

Also, and not insignificant, is the fact that for every 100 minnows, you might catch a whale. If we are a proof of stake chain, then it needs to be advertised that way, and we need to be gathering the stake holders to invest. (I think this is sircork@sircork's point). It's just a little unclear as to what the goal is...I like to think it's a decent place to play for one and all. I'm still for paid advertising, but as a monetized option, like on YT.

@littlescribe: It's difficult | Ecency