Apart from the possibility of the STEEM price falling. There has been quite the talk of power down. Users who have written off their STEEM investment after the hostile take over and with a 3 day power

we should not compare the economics of the sixties to the twenty-first century. Why not? Are you afraid that you might find out the economics of the sixties was better? Sure, we made a lot of improvements

i discovered that 13 weeks status-quo for power down in the steemit blockchain is too much for the concept of what we all call money. Well, when I was young savings accounts with 90 day withdraw where

In fact, we don't need to do anything There is one thing we all have to do: Continue to get more user to vote for witnesses.

Massive power up probably in hope of the next hard fork to set power down to 3 days. But that might not happen as the community regained 7 of the top 20 witness accounts.

Interesting point and I was wondering about that. They have been voted in — but they are only 10% ahead. Is that already a secure enough position?

Thanks for posting text and not a screenshot. Screenshots are quick but you can't copy paste from them.

MAKE SURE YOU ARE NOT VOTING FOR SOCK PUPPET ACCOUNTS It it's working then voting for 22 … 42 might not be the best cause of action any more. Can you post a list of worthy witnesses I can mix into my existing

Since most of them only have 15 Steem Power they are more an annoyance then an issue. But they make a lot of votes:

Ups. Misunderstanding. I meant duplicate topics.

Maybe the witnesses should not have done that. Set's a bad precedent.

So dLive and Steem might join again — after dLive betrayed left Steem 🤦🏼‍♂️. Anyway, I don't know what to make of it. But then there is also not much I could do as most of my Steem is staked. #1ham

dead weight fall by the wayside. Which is fine for a social media using normal databases to store content and a powerful search function to find good groups. The latter I haven't seen on any social media

500 is too much? Depends. 500 in one week is a lot. 500 in six month not so much. I think it's a way to bring some order to what's posted on Steemit. Don't you agree? Yes, but multiple groups to the same

Somewhere I feel that if it continues then soon we will be trying to avoid this complexity. MeWe is/was like this. Everybody was creating groups and sending invitations to everybody to join that group.

100-200$ should be behind communities. Sometimes I wonder if some features should be attached to reputation like StackOverflow does it. Along the line of: No downvotes below reputation 30. That would end

since people just want to create one for themselves to see how it works. And sadly all those curiosity communities will will be left behind on the blockchain. communities may also offer a place of exchange

Well this one 😉

Not all the way back: But compared to Bitcoin the losses are more substantial: Which is pretty much the modus operandi for Steem in the last two years.

Please don't make the whole text italic. It makes it harder to read. You should consider your readers