Hi, do you consider spam to be a matter of convenience?

No, spam is a specific set of behaviors: "Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, non-commercial proselytizing, or any prohibited purpose (especially phishing), or simply repeatedly sending the same message to the same user." (Wikipedia)

Opinions are always FREE, even if you try in every way to NEUTRALIZE them.

Showing a modicum of respect for others is free, and is unlikely to get you downvoted. Don't spam, don't insult, and don't make wild accusations. Free speech doesn't mean anyone is obligated to pay attention to you, and it doesn't mean it's OK to rant irrelevant nonsense in comments on other folks' posts.

The evidence you claim never to have seen (or at least, that is what you want the masses to believe) is published not only by the two or more accounts you’ve repeatedly mentioned but also by other users who, over the years, have publicly shared the same issues—asking EVERYONE for help—only to be promptly ignored by any "WITNESS," "FRONT END," "CAPTAIN," etc.

When I tried to follow the "evidence" presented, I found nothing of substance and swiftly got bored clicking links leading nowhere. I know there are issues, but butthurt spammers and fraudsters are barking up the wrong tree when they complain about getting caught.

I personally dealt with the matter—and you know this full well, because you are part of that group of "SEWER RATS" that harms (and has harmed) users, their creations, their reputations, their earnings, and so on, as well as the commenters and—by extension—the curators who voted for those creations. You try to hide your tracks, just like the worst PARASITES on earth.
Unfortunately, the published evidence can be found—(I REPEAT)—not only on the accounts you mentioned but all over the web, including on my own accounts.

Settle down with the invective, bub. I downvote spam, abusive behavior, and once upon a time, I also chased vote farms milking the chain for all it was worth.

From what you’ve written in other comments, you imply that you "downvote-bombed" my content just for fun or because you mistook me for the users you mentioned. Or are you just STUPID by nature? Because I can’t explain any other reason why you would do it—and by "(YOU)," I mean all those "SEWER RATS" who, like you, got their kicks this way.

When I downvoted you, it was because you were being a dick. You're being a dick again. Stop being a dick.

And yet, if that were the case, you could have simply engaged in a dialogue to understand the situation firsthand, rather than harming users out of sheer amusement, confusion, or stupidity. And yet, even after I had identified myself multiple times—to Hivewatchers and others—you continued without hesitation, emboldened by the belief that you were "untouchable" until September 2025, the date you decreed would mark the true end of HIVE. You assumed you would land on your feet, just as you had all those years leading up to that point.

Dude, what is this rant about? You're spewing nonsense here. This is word salad.

People are cultured enough to respond to comments; whenever any of us creates a post, we are aware that we might face challenges, new ideas, or differing opinions. That is called FREEDOM of expression—a freedom that, unlike yours, does not attack individuals or their intellectual and artistic property simply because of differing views; instead, it fosters dialogue, because people are DIFFERENT (FORTUNATELY).

You haven't actually responded constructively to any of my comments. You just shout these long, irrelevant tirades into the ether and demand I just accept it. This is bad netiquette. Don't do it.

If you really want to harm someone—like SEWER RATS—you do it after a confrontation, but you must always JUSTIFY your reasons.
A user shouldn't receive ten negative votes—all automatic and simultaneous—just because some PARASITE is in a bad mood and wants to destroy them; in this case, it happened to multiple users.
Or worse, it happens because they mistake that user for someone else or because the user writes things that don't align with their own way of thinking.

I vote—up and down—manually. If you've pissed off other enough to get automated votes, that's not my business. Base don our interactions to date, I can see why they might.

[truncating rant for length]

After all, who would dare touch them? Listen, regarding the journalists you mention—it’s best if you or the SEWER RATS LIKE YOU use them to spread your "counter-narrative," since you contradict yourselves every time you write anything.

Right. "Journalists." like Yoko Ono is a "singer," or Flat Earthers are "scientists." Even so, I do not give a shit about what they say or who they denounce. My complaint is very specific: spam. That is what they do. That is why I downvote.

Unfortunately, you lack the command of language needed for proper discussion; perhaps because you’ve always operated on autopilot—slapping labels like "fake," "AI," or "duplicate" onto the wrong people and DAMAGING their reputations, thereby choosing to shoulder FULL responsibility for your actions.

Nope, I can be loquacious and eloquent whilst engaging in civil discourse. Slop is still slop. Spam is still spam. Sometimes people need to be told, "fuck off."

Because I am certain that KARMA—and, I hope, some regulatory body—will take its natural course.
Remember, in life, it is possible to make amends for mistakes; it’s never too late!
You just have to admit them and ask for PUBLIC FORGIVENESS.

Get off your high horse and settle down. Your hurt fee-fees are not an actionable tort. Stop flinging false accusations while pompously citing KARMA. She's probably one of the strippers at Sateline Showgirls, but I don't go there.