German intelligence reported over a month ago that the evidence and information they had could not be revealed because it would not be beneficial to the German government. That the information would be held as "Top Secret" and unavailable.
Ignorantly, we continue to believe the information provided to us in all aspects. By now, the pipeline could have been repaired. To think that in todays day and with the technology, including the incredible abilities of German Engineering, the pipeline is unable to be repaired, is ludicrous. This provokes a simple question. Why would they build a pipeline that is so necessary to the countries that use it, that can not be repaired if something like this or even any "broken" part occurred in the future? In fact, I know it can be repaired and could have been fully repaired in less than a month. The plan has been and will continue to be the same. To continue to direct your attention away from the obvious. To continue to keep you in a false reality that can be easily discredited with the simple questions we should really be asking. Russia doesn't want to fix the pipeline? Germany doesn't want to fix the pipeline? Europe doesn't want to fix the pipeline? Of course Russia would, but is Germany going to let them? Poland?
This is the plan. The plan to dictate a narrative that the enemy is who ever they want to claim. To call the Hersh conclusion as impossible and refuted, isn't the conclusion you should be looking at. But WHY? Why a Ukraine Support Group? Why did Hersh say the US? More misdirection. What is important is that you look at evidence provided earlier that Zalinsky said that the governments should use Nuclear Weapons against Russia and strike first. Then, directly look at the MONEY that has been given to Ukraine. PLUS donations. How much do you think a nuclear weapon costs? Who can Zalinsky get a nuclear weapon from? Then realize, that if "they" would let the pipeline to be broken. That it was purposefully broken. That it is not repaired and is continuously against a country that is inheriting the "call to arms" as the enemy, while causing immense difficulties for the countries that need that pipeline. Who can provide a nuclear weapon, is not necessarily a country outside the support of the Ukraine war. This with so many countries, The US, Germany, Poland, France, Belgium, the UK, and all NATO allies stating that if Ukraine loses, democracy is lost. What are they willing to do to win? Who can they blame? This and remember when Poland was struck by Ukraine artillary? You don't think that is important in this moment of thinking I have directed you? It was an accident? So incredibly wrong, that it meant the weapon was facing in the near opposite direction.
You are put into this box. Time to think outside the box. Not only in terms of the box, but in terms of who put you in it.
RE: NYT's "Refutation" Of Seymour Hersh On Nordstream Is So Preposterous And Blatantly Impossible