I believe in God and my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I am putting this on the table so there isn't any confusion.
I enjoy learning and through my purpose given to me by God, with talents in art and mathematics, it is information and data that inspires and drives me to each moment. It is important that people like you are in the world. I have said for many years that the man on the street corner shouting "Repent, repent! The end is near!" while holding a sign that says: "The world will end today!" is needed. Though you may wake up the next day and think that he is crazy because the world is still going on, it isn't forgotten. You can say "Thankfully I am not that person", but be motiviated to express love to your family because "what if" he is right. This is the summary of the banning of you in all these countries.
I remember some of the news reports of your "ideas" back in the late 90's and early 2000's. But here in is the "conclusion" which is contrarily stronger than speculation. To "debunk" your theories would mean that the person who wanted to be in that position, purposefully to establish themselves, would require research. Would require evidence that supported their claim. But in doing so would then find evidence supporting your claim and therefor create another person that held the same belief. This is why you were banned. Because it was creating more people with the same knowledge and that would go against the need for the PLAN to subvert knowledge by implemeting false ideologies and "facts" that most would not be able to discredit.
Conclusion is the premise, which intellect predicates as the limiting of possibilities. Mathematics directs the process though it isn't in the use of numbers, it is under the same law of "solutions". For example:
X + Y = Z : Where X = 5 and Y can not be a number less than 0. It is verifiable to conclude that Z is greater than or equal to 5. Thus it is a "truth" to conclude that there is evidence that Z will be greater than 5 because the probability of it being 0 is not supported in data that shows that it is greater than 0. This then allows you to determine without doubt that Z will have to have a value of 6 or more. (we will assume that all variables are whole numbers). So when someone tries to prove that Y is less than 0 to prove that your conclusion of Z is false, then also finds that Y will not be 0 and follows the rule that it can not be less than 0, they instantly are part of and in support of your ideology or theory.
In this people are under the impression that you are creating a CULT. But it is not that it all. It is far greater than that. Because a CULT can be easily dismantled by eliminating it's leader. The "priest" that provides the information and is similar to the people who control the narrative now. It is much more dangerous to their plan than that. They also can not eliminate you, because that would bring even more people to become the seekers of truth. What happens in those that receive your information is an option to take a different path. This then creates the most powerful understanding for all mankind in that it creates an Independent Thinker. Not necessarily following your theories but definitely thinking for themselves. There is an abundance of knowledge that people may have learned, but never applied. Thus giving way to an illogical assumption of the reality presented as 100% truth.
It is in my passion and love of math that I have proven that the Heliocentric model is impossible. That the ISS is also mathematically unable to be a reality. Just because it is so absurd, I feel it is necessary to do this:
The ISS is traveling at 17,700 MPH. That is around 5 miles per second. If the ISS is not EXACT as their math proposes, for more than 5 seconds, their MATH then is unable to be retained. Because it would be off EXACTNESS of 25 miles. That would negate all of thier "orbit" math, and thus after or even within 5 seconds, would cause the ISS to no longer have "gravitational pull" and in 1 minute would be around 300 miles further and in 1 hour, 17,700 miles away from the EXACT orbit it requires for their mathematics to be held true. The simplest forms of math, that we all know, is always TRUE. When we use equations like "orbital velocity", the math requires exactitudes. Which is also how I have, AT LEAST, proven Einsteins theory of relativity: E=MC2, to also be FLAWED or undeniably unable to be used as an equation in many cases it is directed as the solution for realities presented.
I enjoy the information you provide. As an independent thinker, I take it all in, but do not assume it all to be true. But, that being said, the math says you are on the right path. That there is TRUTH to an enormous amount of information you provide. But also, it is not specualtion you give, it is the possibilities we can conclude. The real value of Y, is still out there, but the evidence shows that it is much, much greater than 5. Which means it is definitely true that Z is a double digit number or higher. This means we all still need to do the work of gathering the REAL data, the FACTUAL information. This is, by far, an appreciation for the work you do. Keep shouting on the corner. Keep holding that sign that says the world is going to end today. Because you are not crazy. Because the math says, one day, and remarkably very soon, that sign will be the truth.
Thank you David.
RE: The Danger to Truth of Here and no Further | The David Icke Dot-Connector