RE: RE: Splinterlands | Reason I Will Vote NO On The DEC For Riftwatchers Proposal (Again)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Splinterlands | Reason I Will Vote NO On The DEC For Riftwatchers Proposal (Again)

imno(63)
Published in
LeoFinance
Words
313
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
3y

I never wanted a mini set but from the beginning I said if they weren't going to have it, it needed to be a dec burner like it's predecessors. These sets were created to be equalizers for the "DEC out of thin air" problem and when we needed it the most, they made it SPS to the DAO instead. They broke their own system when they did that and we've been suffering for a year because of it.

Matt realizes this and is trying to fix it (it's likely too late) but because people spent SPS on them first, they now doesn't want to see it in DEC because its a discount. Let's be real, most people spent SPS they already had, when it was 7 cents. That means if there were going to hold that SPS anyway, those packs cost them $1.20 in today's SPS.

If you think about it, the only reason we had this year of "DEC back to peg" proposals was because they didn't make RW a dec burner in the first place. Those 1 million packs would have burned through 5 billion DEC. And we probably would have sold more by now because we wouldn't have experienced the economic weight of DEC being half of peg or all the anger from proposals to bring it back to peg and the apathy because it hasn't worked yet.

RW needs to be the last miniset. And it needs to be sold in DEC. And that DEC needs to be burned.

SPS, is not meant to be a transactional currency. It shouldn't be used in the market. It shouldn't be spent as a fee to get into tournaments, and it shouldn't have packs sold in it. The only thing I think should be sold in SPS is node licenses. We need to change the way we look at SPS utility imo

@imno: I never wanted | Ecency