I think people assumed what Saylor did was riskier than it actually was. Like Saylor using corporate debt to buy Bitcoin is very different than a retail trader trading on margin. Like Saylor only has to

Yes Splinterlands will not be included even though I love Splinterlands. Web 3.0 gaming on Hive has their own communities with their own curation projects. I really don’t think it makes sense for me to

I think it was temporary because it’s not sustainable. Like money is coming from something and eventually that money dries up. That’s my opinion anyways.

I don’t think you can change a post to make it fit. If it’s not TradFi that’s fine but then it doesn’t make sense to post it in the TradFi community. This post is not about stocks, bonds, or capital markets.

In the new gaming community I am working on Mobile gaming and Web 3.0 will be muted. We will also have authors that are whitelisted like in TradFi. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns!

I mean…. do people usually play Web 3.0 games for fun or the money? Some people will say both but I think ultimately they want to make that paper.

@rimurutempest I went ahead and upvoted and did not mute this post because you are bringing awareness to an issue which is “if you don’t pay for the product you are the product.” That being said, please

Niantic Is not publicly traded but Nintendo is. Nintendo made about 10-20% of revenue for liscening fees. Nintendo owns 32% stake in Niantic.

You guys are all over the leaderboard. Those battles were simply epic!

LOL! That's actually pretty funny.

No Web 3.0 games unfortunately. There are a lot of communities that curate for that type of content already. Web 2.0 is going to be games like stuff you find on Steam, Xbox, etc. And just to clarify before

Sounds like a risky strategy 😅 I will still pay my taxes but I believe there is a growing movement of people who are revolting against the tax system. My biggest issue with taxes is I literally have no

EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA but they remove things like “Non Recurring” income or “Non Recurring” expenses.

Sounds risky. 🤣

Missed also old days of gaming, where gaming is literally gaming. Yea that’s the big con to adding an investment component to video games is it becomes more about making money and less about the game.

I’m in more of a good vibe mood today 😄

But people treat downvotes differently. So I'm not sure it's all that simple. Maybe we should strive for simplicity though? Idk 🤷‍♂️

Yea I feel like Free Cash Flow is usually a better metric for analyzing the health of a business. EBITDA is a good proxy for cash flow but Adjusted EBITDA is way too adjusted to be helpful sometimes 😆

This is for the Finance nerds out there. If you know what Adjusted EBITDA is, this is actually quite funny lol!