Let's get this out of the way:

On the other hand, rich spoiled brats in adult skin, like markymark can do whatever they want and oppress whoever they want while sensible users get their asses kicked because who's going to stop markymark from writing:

You came here to defend @lasseehlers. so let's not drag other Hive users into this. If you want to reply at me then fine let's discuss how to get @lasseehlers to jump ship for Blurt. I'd enjoy that just as much. If you want to reply to me about downvoting @lasseehlers then let's focus on that. My time is limited today.

Let everyone live their own life because everyone has their own traumas and their own issues and problems. You don't know if, for example, behind his need to get rich is the need to get out of debt that someone has gotten him into or to help a sick family member. (I'm not saying that's the case here, I'm just saying that sometimes we judge people badly because their appearance is bad but it's the result of internal problems and cries for help...)

Actually, I and anyone else who gives a damn can know that because @lasseehlers posts his personal in real life disputes on Hive. @lasseehlers does a piss poor attempt at hiding that by writing those posts in Danish but they are there. For example,

@lasseehlers/hans-kolding-soloinc-har-snydt-og-generet-mig

You can find more examples by scrolling down his feed and looking at posts with the word "BALLHEAD" in the title or just posts titled "deleted", but the text from those posts have been deleted by @lasseehlers.

If @lasseehlers wants to be left alone to live his own life then why does he post about disputes he's had with people who aren't on Hive, can't defend themselves on the platform or give their side of the story?

on a normal platform it should still look like you just mute him and that's it ;]

Hive isn't a centralized platform. Can you explain how you expect "just mute him and that's it" to work when it's decentralized?

You see, the problem is that you "suspect" that it could be an exit scam and you haven't proven it

I never claimed I had to "prove it". When it comes to @lasseehlers circumstantial evidence is a renewable resource and after he piles up enouygh of it there is a preponderance that it is more likely true than not true. Anyway, "scheme" was me being generous. I could very easily use the word "scam" but then I'd have to walk you step by step since you obviously aren't aware of his first DHF proposal's details. "Scheme" is good enough for when I am too busy to walk you through it.

If you haven't read as much of what @lasseehlers has posted then I have how do you expect to successfully defend him anyway? You are already starting off handicapped because I've read things before @lasseehlers deleted them and watched his YouTube videos before he made them private. Putting yourself in his place isn't effective because this isn't about you.